Reinforced concrete pipe cracks : acceptance criteria [revised July 29, 2011].
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Reinforced concrete pipe cracks : acceptance criteria [revised July 29, 2011].

Filetype[PDF-2.49 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report; 07/01/2009-7/1/2011.
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Materials ; NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance ;
    • Abstract:
      Inspection of recently placed reinforced concrete pipes often reveals cracks. Florida DOT was in

      need of in-place crack acceptance criteria. This project was intended to determine the influential parameters

      responsible for crack healing in in-place Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCP), determine what maximum crack

      width was amenable to autogenous healing and sufficient to mitigate reinforcement corrosion, and formulate

      guideline models for pipe crack acceptance criteria during construction. A literature survey indicated a

      reasonable expectation for autogenous healing to eventually occur for cracks narrower than about 0.020 inch.

      The prognosis was less favorable for wider cracks, and there was little assurance that autogenous healing would

      reliably take place for crack widths exceeding about 0.100 inch. Laboratory experiments did not produce

      significant autogenous healing of 0.100-inch or 0.020-inch-wide cracks in reinforced concrete pipe specimens

      over an approximately 2-month-long period. Corrosion tests showed that significant reinforcement wire corrosion

      could take place in a short time in reinforced concrete pipe with 0.100-inch-wide cracks, and that corrosion

      damage was considerably slower when the cracks were 0.020 inch wide. Corrosion was aggravated by the

      presence of moderate chloride ion contamination (500 ppm), but active steel corrosion occurred even without it.

      A predictive model for corrosion development in cracked reinforced concrete showed for 500 ppm chloride very

      short durability projections for the 0.100-inch-wide crack condition, and moderately strong to little limitation in

      durability for the 0.020-inch-wide crack cases. Acceptable crack width guideline models proposed for discussion

      included a restrictive alternative, with 0.020 inch width allowable only for environmental chloride no greater than

      500 ppm; a less restricted alternative allowing 0.020 inch up to 2000 ppm chloride; and a sliding option for up to

      2000 ppm chloride where pipe service life was progressively derated to zero for crack widths increasing from

      0.020 inch to 0.100 inch. In all models the acceptable width defaulted to 0.010 inch if the other conditions were

      not met.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.20