Reinforced concrete pipe cracks : acceptance criteria [revised July 29, 2011].
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Reinforced concrete pipe cracks : acceptance criteria [revised July 29, 2011].

Filetype[PDF-2.49 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final report; 07/01/2009-7/1/2011.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Inspection of recently placed reinforced concrete pipes often reveals cracks. Florida DOT was in

    need of in-place crack acceptance criteria. This project was intended to determine the influential parameters

    responsible for crack healing in in-place Reinforced Concrete Pipes (RCP), determine what maximum crack

    width was amenable to autogenous healing and sufficient to mitigate reinforcement corrosion, and formulate

    guideline models for pipe crack acceptance criteria during construction. A literature survey indicated a

    reasonable expectation for autogenous healing to eventually occur for cracks narrower than about 0.020 inch.

    The prognosis was less favorable for wider cracks, and there was little assurance that autogenous healing would

    reliably take place for crack widths exceeding about 0.100 inch. Laboratory experiments did not produce

    significant autogenous healing of 0.100-inch or 0.020-inch-wide cracks in reinforced concrete pipe specimens

    over an approximately 2-month-long period. Corrosion tests showed that significant reinforcement wire corrosion

    could take place in a short time in reinforced concrete pipe with 0.100-inch-wide cracks, and that corrosion

    damage was considerably slower when the cracks were 0.020 inch wide. Corrosion was aggravated by the

    presence of moderate chloride ion contamination (500 ppm), but active steel corrosion occurred even without it.

    A predictive model for corrosion development in cracked reinforced concrete showed for 500 ppm chloride very

    short durability projections for the 0.100-inch-wide crack condition, and moderately strong to little limitation in

    durability for the 0.020-inch-wide crack cases. Acceptable crack width guideline models proposed for discussion

    included a restrictive alternative, with 0.020 inch width allowable only for environmental chloride no greater than

    500 ppm; a less restricted alternative allowing 0.020 inch up to 2000 ppm chloride; and a sliding option for up to

    2000 ppm chloride where pipe service life was progressively derated to zero for crack widths increasing from

    0.020 inch to 0.100 inch. In all models the acceptable width defaulted to 0.010 inch if the other conditions were

    not met.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov