Johnson Creek Landslide research project, Lincoln County, Oregon : final report to the Oregon Department of Transportation.
-
2008-07-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final report.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:A five-year study indicates that the Johnson Creek landslide moves in response to intense rainfall that raises pore water ; pressure throughout the slide in the form of pulses of water pressure traveling from the headwall graben down the axis of ; the slide at rates of 1.4 to 2.5 m/hr in the upper part and 3.5 m/hr to virtually instantaneous in the middle part. Vertical ; arrays of piezometers measured infiltration at rates of only 50 mm/hr, so infiltration is too slow to affect saturated water ; pressure except in the headwall graben. The hydraulic gradient through the slide mass is small and groundwater flow ; appears to be nearly horizontal, roughly parallel to the slide plane. These observations and the rapidity of pressure ; transmission are consistent with a high effective hydraulic conductivity throughout the slide mass. Westward slope of the ; piezometric surface is consistent with better drainage in the western part of the slide. Movement episodes proceed by en ; masse movement when threshold pore pressures are reached followed by faster and faster movement of the middle portion ; of the slide when pore water pressure there rises above ~9.4 to 10.8 m head above the slide plane. In January 2003, slide ; velocity increased by an order of magnitude when head above the slide plane at the middle observation site reached 11.4 m ; while the western site reached ~9 m, ~2 m above its maximum for the following four winter seasons. Antecedent rainfall ; correlating with this accelerated movement was mean precipitation of 0.84 m in the previous 60 days and 2.1 mm/hr in the ; 62 hours immediately before the movement. Antecedent deformation correlating with the accelerated movement was ; extension of 1 cm in the lower part of the slide, possibly raising effective hydraulic conductivity there. This increased ; hydraulic conductivity may have caused a uniquely rapid pore pressure response in the lower part of the side and the unique ; 2-m increase in head. With respect to engineering solutions for slide mitigation, the reduction of water pressures at the ; headwall graben by dewatering (e.g., drains or pumps) should be effective given the inferred high hydraulic conductivity of ; the slide and sensitivity to pressure change at the graben. Limit equilibrium stability analyses indicate that 3 m of erosion ; would destabilize the slide for most of the winter season. This finding suggests that buttressing the toe of the slide is an ; effective long-term remediation option.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:97f46e902820abf706f8d278d1628616d883dc50ec6b6758b8303c0c450c1f246f3aa8d690965b901af7ee200668e4e98c07475f0d4e9ca3acb5aa547acafeff