Case study of 4(f) litigation/rulings.

Details

• Creators:
  O'Connell, Lenahan ; Hopwood II, Theodore
• Corporate Creators:
  University of Kentucky Transportation Center
• Corporate Contributors:
  Kentucky. Transportation Cabinet ; United States. Federal Highway Administration
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Alternatives Assessment Decision Making Evaluation And Assessment Impacts Litigation Manuals Plan Implementation Property Section 4(f) Section 4(f) Documentation Section 4(f) Litigation Section 4(f) Mitigation Stakeholders

  More +
• Publication/ Report Number:
  KTC-04-13/SPR225-01-1F
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  Kentucky
• Corporate Publisher:
  University of Kentucky Transportation Center
• Abstract:
  This study addresses issues related to compliance with Section 4(f). By referring to the manual Cabinet employees will be to: 1) Conduct an assessment of proposed alternatives to evaluate prudence and feasibility of a proposed project alternative; 2) Prepare 4(f) documentation to justify the taking of protected property; 3) Apply context-sensitive design principles to mitigate impacts and stakeholder concerns; 4) Identify potential 4(f) involvement on private properties; 5) Identify mitigation measures to minimize potential harm to 4(f) resources; 6) Develop a decision-making process where 4(f) impacts are unavoidable-the latter based on judicial rulings arising from 4(f) litigation; 7) Develop strategies to ensure implementation of 4(f) mitigation/project commitments.
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  KYSPR 01-225
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:0a8e4e8a0436cce8155bf3ec97a054f2a4fe3ad87e92115621ab3556b81ecb3ec95e15248c73267d2d41a1dcf2ea5e949cc3a04d216953361102aac54180bd63
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/21587/dot_21587_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 2.11 MB ]