An Examination of the Operational Error Database for Air Route Traffic Control Centers
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

An Examination of the Operational Error Database for Air Route Traffic Control Centers

Filetype[PDF-1.14 MB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
    Rodgers, Mark D.
  • Corporate Creators:
    Civil Aeromedical Institute
  • Corporate Contributors:
    United States. Office of Aviation Medicine
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    DOT/FAA/AM-93/22
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    United States
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Civil Aerospace Medical Institute
  • Abstract:
    Monitoring the frequency and determining the causes of operational errors - defined as the loss of prescribed separation between aircraft - is one approach to assessing the operational safety of the air traffic control system. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) refers to the loss of separation standards between aircraft as an operational error (OE). The extent to which separation is lost determines the severity of the error.

    The first study examined the relationships between error occurrence, controller workload (number of aircraft and traffic complexity) and causal factors involved. The FAA's Final Operational Error/Deviation Reports for ARTCC facilities during calendar years 1985-88 comprised the data base. A majority of the errors occurred under conditions of below average (25%) or average (39%) complexity. Complexity and number of aircraft were highly correlated. However, there was a significant difference across facilities in average workload during an event. Improved guidelines for quality assurance personnel are needed to insure a more standardized determination and reporting of workload dimensions. Results suggested that the frequency of some of the causal factors varied in response to changes in number of aircraft worked and traffic complexity.

    The second study analyzed the workload and causal factors related to the severity of OEs at ARTCCs during 1988-91. Neither the number of aircraft being worked nor air traffic complexity were significantly associated with severity. In general, the causal factors that resulted in greater severity likely involved reduced situation awareness by the controller. The relationship of aircraft profiles and flight levels with OE severity were examined. Facility level differences were reviewed regarding controller workload and awareness of the developing error.

    More in depth information is needed to determine precisely the manner in which alterations in workload influence the nature of the error process. Both studies point to the need for increasing the level of objectivity in the operational error investigation process.

  • Content Notes:
    An examination of the workload conditions associated with operational errors/deviations at air route traffic control centers.; Factors associated with the severity of operational errors at air route trafic control centers.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov