Increasing carpooling in Vermont : opportunities and obstacles.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Increasing carpooling in Vermont : opportunities and obstacles.

Filetype[PDF-435.62 KB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Growth in car ownership, dispersed land settlement patterns, highway investments, travel behavior and

    socio‐economic changes have all contributed to a dramatic increase in automobile use in the U.S. over

    the last 80 years.1 The resulting health, environmental and energy impacts related to automobile

    dependence are of concern to policy‐makers in the US and Vermont. 2 Proposed solutions range from

    increasing the use of public transportation, walking and biking, shifting vehicle fuels from petroleum to

    other sources or even encouraging changes in the built environment to reduce car trips.3

      

    One proposed solution is to increase the number of people in each vehicle which does not require

    extensive investment of public capital, relying instead on the existing infrastructure and already owned

    private automobiles.4 Carpooling can increase personal mobility, access to services, reduce

    environmental and infrastructure impacts, reduce individual transportation costs and save energy. For

    example, average vehicle occupancy rates in the US for work trips are about 1.1 per vehicle, down from

    1.3 in 1977. Slight increases in the number of people per vehicle could provide the same energy savings

    as switching to an alternative fuel, without building new fueling stations or making any new additional

    investments.5

    However, the percentage of commuters carpooling has significantly decreased since 1980 both

    nationally and in Vermont. Factors in that decline include increasing car ownership, decreases in

    household size, changes in travel behavior, the relatively low cost of energy and other socio‐

    demographic changes. The purpose of this research is to examine potential obstacles and opportunities

    to increasing carpooling for the journey‐to‐work commute in Vermont and provide research‐based

    information for state policy‐makers regarding programs and policies designed to increase carpooling in

    Vermont. 6

    This research is jointly funded through the VTrans Efficient Transportation Systems project and the UVM

    Transportation Research Center (TRC) Signature Focus Area Transportation Energy and System

    Efficiency. In this report, we focus on the GoVermont program – a state managed rideshare matching

    program – as a window into the obstacles and opportunities to increasing carpooling in Vermont. We

    conducted an initial survey of 370 GoVermont participants and then conducted four in‐depth

    conversations with 25 of those respondents. Researchers also reviewed GoVermont materials, previous

    research on carpooling and examined data from the US Census and NHTS data on travel behavior at the

    individual and household level.  

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov