An investigation of the utility and accuracy of the table of speed and stopping distances specified in the Code of Virginia.

Details

• Creators:
  Jernigan, Jack D ; Kodaman, Meltem F
• Corporate Creators:
  Virginia. Dept. of Transportation ; Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Automobile Driving--Braking Reaction Time
• Publication/ Report Number:
  FHWA/VTRC 01-R13
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  Virginia
• Edition:
  Final report.June 2000Feb. 2001.
• Corporate Publisher:
  Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
• Abstract:
  This study was conducted pursuant to House Joint Resolution No. 74 introduced by Delegate R. Creigh Deeds during the 2000 Session of the Virginia General Assembly. The resolution requested that the Virginia Transportation Research Council study the table of speed and stopping distances specified in 46.2-880 of the Code of Virginia, especially with regard to the accuracy, completeness, and currency of the data contained in the table; the amendments that might be necessary or desirable; and the usefulness and appropriateness of continuing to include the table in the Code. The authors concluded that information provided in a table of speed and stopping distances can be useful to judges and juries in their deliberations. They also found the data in the table to be inaccurate. Specifically, the reaction time of 3/4 second did not incorporate the factor of perception time that is relevant to total stopping distance. Allowing for perception time would double the estimate of the total distance traveled before braking. Further, the braking distances in the table were too great. These distances were calculated without consideration of such factors as improved road surface conditions, improved tires, and increasingly sophisticated braking systems. The authors recommend that the table of speed and stopping distances in 46.2-880 of the Code be updated as specified in this study. The authors also recommend that the revised table be used within judicially recognized limits, which is to say for illustrative purposes rather than as affirmative proof (or disproof) of a defendant's negligence.
• Format:
  PDF
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha256:fa011e5c1a7a99c48b629dff3c366e866de5c3037b71e49bd1f013b3fa6892c3
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19529/dot_19529_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 161.44 KB ]