Drug Per Se Laws: A Review of their Use in States

Lacey, John; Brainard, Katharine; Snitow, Samantha; Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation

doi:10.21949/1525747

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Drug Per Se Laws: A Review of their Use in States

2010-07-01
By Lacey, John ; Brainard, Katharine ; Snitow, Samantha

[PDF-4.53 MB]

English

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Creators:

Lacey, John ; Brainard, Katharine ; Snitow, Samantha

Lacey, John ; Brainard, Katharine ; Snitow, Samantha Less -
Corporate Creators:

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
Subject/TRT Terms:

[+]

Drugged Drivers Drug Use Impaired Drivers Law Enforcement Per Se Laws Prosecution Recommendations State Laws
Publication/ Report Number:

DOT HS 811 317
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21949/1525747
Resource Type:

Tech Report
Geographical Coverage:

United States
Corporate Publisher:

United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Office of Behavioral Safety Research
Abstract:

This report summarizes a study of the implementation of drug per se laws in 15 States. These laws generally make it an impaired-driving offense to drive with a measurable amount of certain drugs in one’s system. The specific prohibited drugs vary by State. The laws are generally integrated into the States’ overall impaired-driving statute. Though all 15 States were studied to some degree, deeper study of the process was conducted in 6 States. This involved discussions with government officials and law enforcement officers, and a series of structured discussions with prosecutors. This study was not an impact evaluation of drug per se laws on crashes, but rather an attempt to gain an understanding of how the drug per se laws are implemented and perceptions about the law of those charged with implementing the law. It was initially intended that the study would also assess the effect of passing driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) per se laws on the volume of DUID arrests and on conviction patterns, but data to directly address those issues were not available. A general consensus among law enforcement officers we held discussions with was the adoption of drug per se laws did not necessarily make enforcement easier, but did have a positive effect on prosecution. This general perception was shared by prosecutors we interviewed. Because the drug per se laws have typically been adopted as a component of States’ impaired-driving statutes, one difficulty of this study was obtaining accurate data on volume of arrests and conviction rates for the DUID component of the impaired-driving law was problematic. Recommendations include developing a procedure where impaired-driving citations indicate drugs, alcohol, or both, but also adopting procedures ensure information is integrated into computerized data systems of both law enforcement agencies and courts.
Format:

PDF
Funding:

DTNH22-02-D-95121, Task #13
Collection(s):

NHTSA - Behavioral Safety Research
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:c5af65cff21962d18d4cf78689eb53f1079014c13407d1fd288e5b17a9049a24
Download URL:

https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/1948/dot_1948_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Drug Per Se Laws: A Review of their Use in States

Details:

Supporting Files

You May Also Like