Temporary asphalt medians for two-lane, two-way operation.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Temporary asphalt medians for two-lane, two-way operation.

Filetype[PDF-2.70 MB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
    Cottrell, Benjamin H
  • Corporate Creators:
    Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    89-R24.
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    Virginia
  • Edition:
    Final report.Oct. 1985Feb. 1989.
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
  • Abstract:
    A typical temporary asphalt median for two-lane, two-way operation is 12 to 18 in wide, 4 in high, is painted with yellow reflectorized paint, and has orange tubular markers with reflectorized white collars mounted at a spacing of about 50 ft. This highly visible median is a cost-effective alternative to portable concrete. median barriers which separate opposing traffic streams during reconstruction. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the performance of temporary asphalt medians for use in two-lane, two-way operations as an alternative to portable concrete barriers and, if appropriate, to develop guidelines for the use of temporary asphalt medians. Use of the temporary asphalt median was evaluated at one site. The median was installed and removed at least twice as fast as concrete barriers, thereby reducing the time traffic is exposed to such activities by at least 50 percent. There was no difference in the cost per linear foot of the median and concrete barrier because of a relatively high contract cost for the median compared to median costs in other states. However, use of the median will save a minimum of $40,000 ($80,000 on this project) by eliminating the use if impact attenuators at the concrete barrier end sections. It is expected that the costs will decrease as more medians are used. In fact, the cost per linear foot of the median was 40 percent lower on the second project in Virginia using the median. There is no evidence to suggest that the temporary asphalt median directly contributed to any accidents. However, it does appear that the presence of an intersection within two-lane, two-way operation may have been a factor in some accidents. The median performed well. Guidelines were developed for the use of the median.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov