Virkar, S. R., Wall, J. D., & Kelly, V. M. (1989). Issues concerning the adoption of an administrative per se statute by the Commonwealth of Virginia (Report No. VTRC 89-R15). Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19214
Virkar, Salil R, James D Wall, and Veronica M Kelly. Issues concerning the adoption of an administrative per se statute by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Report no. VTRC 89-R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), 1989. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19214.
Virkar, Salil R, et al. Issues concerning the adoption of an administrative per se statute by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), 1989, Report no. VTRC 89-R15, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19214.
The most effective measures to deter drunken driving are legal actions that provide for certain, serious, and swift sanctions. An administrative per se statute that summarily revokes or suspends a driver's license for a DUI offense satisfies these criteria. Because the revocation would be imposed by an administrative, rather than a judicial, system, concerns about due process violations have been raised. Although the Supreme Court has never directly ruled on the constitutionality of an administrative per se statute, its rulings in other cases provide indications of what would be required for such a statute to be found constitutional. This report reviews the relevant cases on the issues of due process and double jeopardy. It also discusses the statutes and experience of states with per se laws and studies that document the impact of such laws. In addition to deterring drunken driving, enactment of an administrative per se statute would benefit Virginia by bringing the Commonwealth one step closer to qualifying for additional federal funds.
Virkar, S. R., Wall, J. D., & Kelly, V. M. (1989). Issues concerning the adoption of an administrative per se statute by the Commonwealth of Virginia (Report No. VTRC 89-R15). Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19214
Virkar, Salil R, James D Wall, and Veronica M Kelly. Issues concerning the adoption of an administrative per se statute by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Report no. VTRC 89-R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), 1989. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19214.
Virkar, Salil R, et al. Issues concerning the adoption of an administrative per se statute by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC), 1989, Report no. VTRC 89-R15, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19214.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.