Evaluation of channelizing devices for work zones : type II barricades and chevron panels.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of channelizing devices for work zones : type II barricades and chevron panels.

Filetype[PDF-1.57 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The objectives of this research were (1) to evaluate the 4-in. (10.2-cm) and 6-in. (15.2-cm) wide alternating diagonal stripes on barricade rails less than 3 ft. (0.92-m) long, and (2) to select the most effective chevron panel. A secondary objective was to investigate minimum sight distance requirements for work zone lane closures. These objectives were accomplished by (1) conducting field tests on the channelizing devices using the position of lane changing as the measure of performance and (2) conducting observer evaluations to obtain detection and legibility distances and preferences for various channelizing devices and taper arrays. It was found that the 6-in. (15.2-cm) wide stripes barricade rails less than 3 ft. (0.92 m) long were more than the 4-in. (10.2-cm) wide stripes. A chevron (18 in. x 24 in. [0.46 m x 0.61 m]) with a black arrow was more effective than a chevron with a white arrow. Overall, the large chevron (24 in. x 30 in. [0.61 m x 0.77m])with a black arrow and 80-ft. (24.2-m) spacing was the most effective chevron panel. The chevron w black arrow and 40-ft. (12.2-m) taper spacing was rated second overall effectiveness. A minimum desirable sight distance of 1,500 ft. (457.5 m) and a minimum allowable sight distance of 1,000 ft. (305 m) were suggested for work zone lane closures.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov