Condemnation procedure alternatives for Virginia.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Condemnation procedure alternatives for Virginia.

Filetype[PDF-5.53 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Creators:
      Merrill, Dennis G
    • Corporate Creators:
      Virginia Highway Research Council
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
      VHRC 72-R14
    • Resource Type:
      Tech Report
    • Geographical Coverage:
      Virginia
    • Corporate Publisher:
      Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
    • Abstract:
      Fifty-four judges were interviewed and at least one judge in each of the forty judicial circuits was questioned. Some of the observations on the present procedure were as follows: (1) a substantial number of judges were dissatisfied with the procedure, (2) a majority of the judges believed that the commissioners based their awards on considerations other than fair market value, and (3) a number of judges expressed the opinion that awards were generally high. Observations on alternative were that (1) the judges overwhelmingly opposed the use of regular civil juries in condemnation cases; (2) while only 13 judges were asked about the matter, most of those commenting did not consider the proposed requirement that jurors be freeholders to be significant in changing the character of the jury, and (3) a majority of judges indicated an interest in and support for the selection of commissioners by a committee and the drawing of commissioners by lot for each case.
    • Format:
      PDF
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26