Effective field use of high-range, water-reduced concrete : final report.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Effective field use of high-range, water-reduced concrete : final report.

Filetype[PDF-3.18 MB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
    Sprinkel, Michael M
  • Corporate Creators:
    Virginia Highway & Transportation Research Council
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA/VA-82/24
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    Virginia
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
  • Abstract:
    This report describes the experience of the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation with the use of high range, water reduced (HRWR) concrete. A description of the installation of the HRWR concrete in two pavements and four bridge decks, along with the results of evaluative tests, is given in Appendix A. Appendix B details the evaluations of HRWR concretes prepared in the laboratory at the Research Council. Based on the field and laboratory experience, recommendations concerning the further use of HRWR concrete by the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation were formulated. As noted in Appendix A, on the average the HRWR concrete placed in the field with conventional equipment was properly consolidated and controlled. However, because of the unanticipated variability of the concrete, portions of the concrete exhibited inadequate consolidation, segregated mixture components, improperly entrained air, shrinkage cracks, and poor finishes. Also, specimens subjected to cycles of freezing and thawing showed low durability factors that were attributed to an unsatisfactory air void system. As noted in Appendix B, subsequent laboratory work revealed that HRWR admixtures satisfied the requirements of ASTM C494. On the basis of the results of the laboratory work, explanations were developed for the problems that occurred in the field.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov