The effectiveness of written driver knowledge tests.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

The effectiveness of written driver knowledge tests.

Filetype[PDF-4.23 MB]


  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Creators:
      Stoke, Charles B
    • Corporate Creators:
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
      VHTRC 79-R41
    • Resource Type:
      Tech Report
    • Geographical Coverage:
      Virginia
    • Corporate Publisher:
      Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
    • Abstract:
      Highway Safety Program Standard 5, Driver Licensing, issued by the U. S. Department of Transportation requires, in part, that the states test applicants for a renewal of their operator's license on rules of the road at least once every 4 years. The state of Virginia requested a waiver of the knowledge testing portion of the standard until evidence could be presented to show that it had the desired safety benefit. The Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council and the Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles conducted an experimental evaluation of several alternative approaches to implementation of the standard. This evaluation randomly assigned members of the renewal population of drivers to four study groups: (1) a control group receiving no treatment; (2) a group that received only a driver's manual; (3) a group that received a manual and a test to be taken at home; and (4) a group that received a manual and were requested to take a test in the DMV examining station at the time of application for license renewal. The subsequent driving performance of members of the four groups was monitored and data for accidents, major convictions, minor convictions, accidents with associated convictions, and administrative actions taken under provisions of the Driver Improvement Program were tabulated at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month intervals. For the two groups administered a knowledge test, comparisons were made of the performance of those who had passed, failed, or refused to take the test. Of the few statistically significant differences found between the study groups, none would suggest the practicality of knowledge testing as an effective highway safety countermeasure. A large number of the differences observed involved the group who had refused to take the test at home. Other than for the minor conviction entries for this group, there were no comparisons which showed differences across all four time periods. The results obtained at the end of the four study time periods supplied no substantial evidence for requiring the reexamination of the general renewal population. In light of these results, the U. S. Department of Transportation should make permanent the temporary waiver of the requirement for reexaminations on knowledge of the rules of the road in the Driver Licensing Standard granted the Commonwealth of Virginia. Further, the results indicate that the Standard should be amended to eliminate the requirement for such reexaminations.
    • Format:
      PDF
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26