This is a fairly unbiased review of the issue of driver distraction framed for used in the EU. From the perspective of providing new data this paper is lacking, however this does framing for the EU and the more international perspective is interesting when compared to the US based reviews. Generally the position of this review is that hands-free is not safer than hand-held. While this paper liberally cites research studies, it does not highlight the specific methodological concerns with various research reports. This review concludes with a number of sensible research-based recommendations for action.
*These are national-level rules. Australian Road Rules - 2009 Version, Part 18, Division 1, Rule 300 "Use of Mobile Phones" describes restrictions of ...
This study examined the interaction of the cognitive and technological aspects of distracted driving as well as physical health among commercial drive...
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.
United States Department of Transportation
[PDF-144.00 KB]
