Details:

Creators:
Borden, Roy H.
Corporate Creators:
North Carolina State University. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering
Subject/TRT Terms:
[+]
Backfilling Pavements, Asphalt--North Carolina--Subgrades--Testing Pavements--North Carolina--Subgrades--Testing Reinforced Soils--North Carolina Soil Chemistry--North Carolina--Testing Soil Stabilization Soil Stabilization--North Carolina
Publication/ Report Number:
FHWA/NC/2008-07
Resource Type:
Tech Report
Geographical Coverage:
North Carolina
Edition:
Final report; Aug. 2007-Dec. 2009.
Corporate Publisher:
North Carolina. Dept. of Transportation
Abstract:
The main objectives of the research work were to develop a systematic approach for determining whether or not undercut is

necessary, and to investigate the adequacy of stabilization measures as implemented in conjunction with the undercut approach.

The research work encompassed small and large scale laboratory testing, limited field testing using DCP, and numerical analyses

and modeling. The following milestones were achieved based on the work performed in this project:

i. Establishment of undercut design criteria based on the magnitude of strength and modulus of the subgrade soils. The

undercut criteria were based on meeting a deformation limit state of 1 inch for both pumping and rutting, but with the additional

requirement that bearing resistance of subgrade is at least twice the applied tire pressure to minimize the potential for rutting.

ii. Development of a procedure for the use of DCP to provide input data for undercut criteria on the basis of modulus and

strength. The proposed procedures are based on the analysis of the DCP data using wave mechanics and offer the advantage of

using the DCP data to discern the need for undercut with depth (by applying the proposed undercut criteria incrementally) at the

various phases of design and construction.

iii. Development of guidelines for specifying a stabilization measure to achieve adequate subgrade support. Five stabilization

measures were investigated through the performance of 22 large scale laboratory tests. These included the use of select fill,

aggregate base course (ABC), geogrids with ABC, geotextiles with ABC, and lime stabilization. The performance of each

stabilization measure was investigated in the laboratory and through numerical analyses.

iv. Demonstrating the applicability of the proposed measures in several field configurations. Four field cases were idealized

from actual project sections. The field cases were numerically modeled with the stabilization measures, and observations were

made regarding subgrade response under static, proof roll, and cyclic loading.

v. Performance of a comparative cost analysis to illustrate the relative cost of each stabilization measure in relation to

measured performance (surface deformation). The cost analyses were performed with results presented in a normalized form in

an attempt to account for variables such as strength of the stabilization measure and subgrade deformation.


Format:
PDF
Collection(s):
US Transportation Collection
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:4eb8395eb8c6a037b40e8a4875fe7e93fc0906ba315dda45ca9360969612a2e2
Download URL:
https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/18455/dot_18455_DS1.pdf
File Type:

Supporting Files

• No Additional Files

More +