Monitoring and evaluation of fly ash stabilization stabilized subgrade constructed by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Monitoring and evaluation of fly ash stabilization stabilized subgrade constructed by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation.

Filetype[PDF-5.35 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Monitoring and evaluation of fly ash stablilization stabilized subgrade constructed by the Wisconsin DOT;Monitoring and evaluation of fly ash stablilization stabilized subgrade constructed by the WISDOT;
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Abstract:
      This report describes the monitoring and evaluation of a field site where Class C fly ash was used to stabilize the

      subgrade during construction of a rigid pavement in a portion of USH 12 near Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin.

      Additionally, information from a second similar project (STH 32 near Port Washington, WI) that was monitored only

      during construction and a third project (STH 60 near Lodi, WI) that was monitored for 8 years is reported. The

      following observations are made based on this investigation:

      1. All of the tests consistently indicated that the stiffness and strength of the subgrade were improved significantly

      by fly ash stabilization at all sites. Observation during construction, however, clearly demonstrated the benefit of

      fly ash stabilized subgrade (FASS) because once the fly ash is mixed and compacted in a window of dry weather

      the FASS remained stiff in subsequent rain events.

      2. It is noted several significantly different soil types were encountered in all sites and the fly ash contents and

      moisture contents were variable (10% and 12% and 7-14%, respectively). Resulting California bearing ratio and

      moduli also varied. The gain in stiffness and strength are typically 2-3 times due to fly ash stabilization. In situ

      stiffness measured with the soil stiffness gage and dynamic cone penetration index also illustrated that the

      addition of the fly ash and compaction increased the strength and stiffness appreciably. These findings suggest

      that fly ash stabilization of subgrade should be beneficial in terms of increasing pavement capacity and service

      life.

      3. The data also indicates a complex relationship between base soil type, amount of fly ash, and water content. For

      instance, in some soils (e.g., clay) the effectiveness of stabilization decreases when the water content of the soil

      increases whereas in some other soils (e.g., sandy) it increases. Therefore, a careful mix design is needed for fly

      ash stabilization involving all potential subgrade soils. The results from all sites also confirm that fly ash

      stabilization results in a relatively stiffer layer irrespective of the type of soil.

      4. Resilient Modulus of the field-mixed FASS is close to that of undisturbed samples of FASS obtained by thinwall

      tube sampler. Thus, the field-mixed FASS can be considered to be an effective method of assessing the in

      situ soil stiffness.

      5. Moduli back-calculated from the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) test data indicated that, modulus does not

      display significant reduction over the years.

      6. Pavement distress surveys indicate that fly ash stabilized sections perform comparable to control sections

      stabilized with breaker run.

      7. Percolation from the pavement varies seasonally. Concentration of some elements from the leachate exceeded

      the Wisconsin preventive action and enforcement limits. However, these concentrations are expected to fall

      below the limits during transport to the groundwater table.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26