Welcome to ROSA P | Multimodal network models for robust transportation systems. - 17814 | US Transportation Collection
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Multimodal network models for robust transportation systems.
  • Published Date:
  • Language:
Filetype[PDF-1.40 MB]

  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • OCLC Number:
  • NTL Classification:
  • Format:
  • Abstract:
    Since transportation infrastructure projects have a lifetime of many decades, project developers must consider

    not only the current demand for the project but also the future demand. Future demand is of course uncertain and should

    be treated as such during project design. Previous research for Southwest Region University Transportation Center

    (Report 167556) explored the impact of uncertainty on roadway improvements and found neglecting uncertainty to lead

    to suboptimal network design decisions. This research is extended in the current work by considering not only motor

    vehicle traffic, but other modes as well.

    The first half of this report examines the problem of network flexibility in the face of uncertainty when

    constructing a potentially revenue-generating toll road project. Demand uncertainty and network design are considered

    by way of a bilevel stochastic recourse model. The results from a test network, for which a closed form solution is

    possible, indicate that the value of network flexibility directly depends on initial network conditions, variance in future

    travel demand, and toll pricing decisions.

    The second half of this report integrates Environmental Justice into the transit frequency-setting problem while

    considering uncertainty in travel demand from protected populations. The overarching purpose is to improve access via

    transit to basic amenities to: 1) reduce the disproportionate burden transit dependent populations’ experience; and 2)

    increase the financial security of low-income households by giving them a feasible option to reduce their dependence on

    autos. The example application illustrates the formulation successfully increases access to employment opportunities for

    residents in areas with the high percentages of low-income persons, as well as demonstrates the importance of

    considering uncertainty in the locations of low-income populations and employment.

  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
Submit Feedback >