A personal rapid transit/airport automated people mover comparison.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Add terms to the query box

Query box

Help
Clear All
i

A personal rapid transit/airport automated people mover comparison.

Filetype[PDF-303.79 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Creators:
    • Resource Type:
    • OCLC Number:
      758891365
    • Corporate Publisher:
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-AVIATION-Airports and Facilities ; NTL-PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLES-Pedestrians ; NTL-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION-PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ; NTL-RAIL TRANSPORTATION-RAIL TRANSPORTATION ;
    • Abstract:
      Airport automated people movers (AAPM) typically consist of driverless trains with up to about four cars each capable of carrying 20 to 100 passengers who are mostly standing. They have been successfully used for surface transportation in airports for over thirty years. A new category of automated people mover called personal rapid transit (PRT) is being implemented at London’s Heathrow International Airport. Although the Heathrow system will replace shuttle buses, it may be more pertinent to examine the differences between PRT and traditional AAPM. PRT uses small (3 to 4 passenger) vehicles (transportation pods or T-Pods) to automatically transport passengers and their luggage non-stop to their destinations along designated guideways. Trips are typically on-demand and T-Pods are often waiting at stations prior to the arrival of passengers. The resulting short wait and trip times combine with seated travel to provide an exceptionally high level of service. This paper compares AAPM systems to PRT systems similar to the type being installed at Heathrow Airport. Items compared include infrastructure items such as stations, guideways and tunnels; level of service items such as waiting, standing and trip times; cost items such as capital and operating costs; as well as safety and security issues. The paper discusses PRT viability and concludes with a brief discussion of the ability of PRT to facilitate solutions to common airport issues such as in-concourse transportation and curbside congestion. PRT is found to have many advantages over AAPM for transporting passengers and their luggage on airports. It is suggested that PRT alternatives should be included in airport planning projects.
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.18