Long-term performance of GFRP reinforcement : technical report.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Long-term performance of GFRP reinforcement : technical report.

Filetype[PDF-7.28 MB]

Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • OCLC Number:
    • Edition:
      Technical report; Sept. 2007-Aug. 2008.
    • NTL Classification:
    • Abstract:
      Significant research has been performed on glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) concrete reinforcement.

      This research has shown that GFRP reinforcement exhibits high strengths, is lightweight, can decrease time of

      construction, and is corrosion resistant. Regarding the corrosion resistance, research has shown that the chemical

      reactions that occur in GFRP bars do not result in expansive products—products that can damage the concrete

      surrounding the reinforcement. Although not classical steel corrosion, much research that has been performed

      shows that GFRP reinforcing bars do corrode, reducing the tensile capacity of the GFRP reinforcing bars as a

      function of time. The American Concrete Institute (ACI) recognized this and places a reduction factor on the

      allowable design strength of GFRP reinforcing bars. A drawback of the majority of the research is that GFRP

      reinforcing bars have typically been directly exposed to aggressive solutions, exposure conditions possibly not

      similar to the exposure they would encounter while embedded in concrete. Limited research has been performed

      evaluating the tensile capacity reduction of bars embedded in concrete; however, these bars were only exposed for

      relatively short durations.

      This research investigated the characteristics of GFRP reinforcing bars embedded in concrete for 7 years and

      exposed to a mean annual temperature of 69 oF (23 oC) and an average precipitation of 39.7 inches (1008 mm),

      fairly evenly distributed throughout the year. Three manufacturers provided #5 and #6 bars for this research.

      Results indicate that GFRP reinforcing bars do exhibit reduced capacities when embedded in concrete. A model

      was developed to assess the tensile capacity of bars embedded in concrete. The model was based on a general

      diffusion model, where diffusion of water or ions penetrate the bar matrix and degrade the glass fibers. The model

      is dependent on time, diffusion characteristics of the matrix material, and the radius of the GFRP reinforcing bar.

      The model indicates that GFRP reinforcement bars with larger diameters exhibit lower rates of capacity loss.

      However, the times required for the tensile capacity of the GFRP bars to drop below the ACI design requirements

      for #3, #5, and #6 bars were less than 6 years. Further research is needed to determine how this will affect the

      design of GFRP-reinforced concrete structures; however, consideration of changing the ACI design requirement

      may be warranted.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.21