Permeability and stability of base and subbase materials : executive summary, August 2000.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Permeability and stability of base and subbase materials : executive summary, August 2000.

Filetype[PDF-88.93 KB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    University of Toledo. Dept. of Civil Engineering
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA-OH 2000/017
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    Ohio
  • Edition:
    Executive summary.
  • Corporate Publisher:
    University of Toledo. Dept. of Civil Engineering
  • Abstract:
    This study determined the hydraulic conductivities, effective porosities and resilient moduli of several current and proposed drainable base materials. The materials studied were AASHTO No. 57, AASHTO No. 67, ODOT No. 304, ODOT No. 310, Iowa DOT No. 41-21 ('IA mix') and the 'New Jersey mix' studied by Baumgartner (1992). An in situ hydraulic conductivity test was developed for coarse grained materials under existing pavements. This device was tested on test sections of St. Rte. 2 for drainable bases composed of asphalt and Portland cement stabilized AASHTO No. 57, ODOT No. 304, ODOT No. 310, Iowa DOT No. 41-21 and the New Jersey mix. A large scale, horizontal laboratory permeameter and testing procedur; were developed to simulate in situ conditions under a pavement. This was used to determine the range of hydraulic conductivities and effective porosities of several drainable bases made up of gravel, limestone and air cooled blast furnace slag over the range of gradations permitted by their specifications. The specifications studied were AASHTO No. 57, AASHTO No. 67, ODOT No. 304, ODOT No. 310, Iowa DOT No. 41-21 and the New Jersey mix. AASHTO No. 57 and AASHTO No. 67 were also stabilized with asphalt or Portland cement and tested. The resilient moduli of both stabilized and unstabilized base and subbase materials as a function of material variation were also investigated for this study, Wide variations exist in the hydraulic conductivities and effective porosities within gradation envelopes. All of the specifications tested can provide hydraulic conductivities in excess of 0.353 cm/s (1000 ft./day) in some portion of their gradation envelope. The lower limit of the gradation envelope (coarser) should be followed for ODOT 304 and ODOT 310. Stabilization reduces the hydraulic conductivity and effective porosity. The effective porosities suggest that most freely drained bases exist in a partially saturated state. Unstabilized No. 57 was found to have an equal or higher resilient modulus than the dense graded bases tested (ODOT 304, 310 and IA mix) for these moist conditions. Gravel generally provided the highest moduli, followed by limestone and air cooled blast furnace slag. Test procedures, equipment lists, data table worksheets, computer codes, field test results and laboratory test results are reproduced in Appendices A through Q, in an accompanying volume.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Funding:
    14512(0)
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov