Remaining life assessment of in-service luminaire support structures : final report, January 2010.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Remaining life assessment of in-service luminaire support structures : final report, January 2010.

Filetype[PDF-4.15 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • OCLC Number:
      664685082
    • Edition:
      Final research report.
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Bridges and Structures;NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Highway Safety;
    • Abstract:
      Recent fatigue failures of in-service luminaire support structures in Washington and around the country have

      prompted concern about their fatigue resistance. Most luminaire support structures in Washington were designed

      without attention to fatigue or with vague and incomplete fatigue design provisions. Furthermore, most luminaire

      support structures were installed during the construction of the Interstate system in the 1960s, and as many as half

      are estimated to have exceeded their 25-year design life. This research was initiated to help the Washington State

      Department of Transportation (WSDOT) prioritize the inspection and replacement of luminaire support structures

      throughout the state and to develop rational inspection procedures.

      The research had four primary components: a literature review, experimental fatigue testing of two in-service

      luminaire poles, a finite element analysis of the pole base, and development of a framework for estimating

      remaining life. The extensive literature review found previous experimental studies, which were used to identify

      details in older WSDOT luminaire support structures that may be critical and to help inform the selection of test

      specimens. Quasi-static and high cycle fatigue testing were performed on two previously in-service luminaire poles

      to determine the stress concentration factors (SCF) in critical details and determine fatigue resistance. The results

      were then compared to the finite element analysis and the fatigue classifications used in design. The finite element

      model was also used to determine the impact of parameters including base plate thickness, hand hole stiffener

      thickness, and location of anchor bolts. The individual components of a framework for estimating the remaining

      life of luminaire support structures in Washington were developed on the basis of a procedure established by Foley

      et al. (2004) in their study of the remaining life of sign bridge structures.

      The remaining fatigue life of the critical details in the previously in-service luminaire support structures were

      found to exceed their design life. Cracking at the stiffened hand hole detail was found to be the ultimate limit state

      for both specimens but was observed at cycle counts that were well beyond the design life. High SCFs were

      measured in both compression and tension at the CJP weld toe, indicating the importance of base plate flexibility,

      anchor bolt layout, and a uniform bearing surface. While it was not possible to know the load history for the

      selected specimens, it is clear that the number of damaging cycles was low and that the fatigue design life for these

      details is conservative. Recommendations for luminaire inspection are provided.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26