Identification of pavement marking colors : executive summary.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Identification of pavement marking colors : executive summary.

Filetype[PDF-12.21 KB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Executive summary.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is charged with selecting and enforcing color

    specifications for pavement markings. In recent years, changes in materials have affected the

    physical appearance of these markings. Even though, at application, the colors meet current federal

    specifications, the specifications themselves are sketchy and, in some cases, given in terms of the

    physical properties of the materials rather than appearance. This method is particularly troublesome

    since the markings are viewed under a variety of lighting conditions and against different colored

    backgrounds (pavement types). Perhaps more of a problem is that current practice requires only a

    subjective evaluation of whether colors are within specification. Recently, the ODOT has also been

    put under a legislative mandate to require that a certain percentage of their contracts contain

    warranties. This mandate makes it necessary to develop appropriate specifications for acceptable

    changes in the color of pavement markings over time. Research is needed to develop these

    specifications with regard to the color appearance properties of markings. They need to be more

    relevant to the needs of the driver than the current specifications, and guidelines for objective

    evaluation need to be provided. This research includes a review of current literature on color,

    perception, and measurement as well as a review of current practices with regard to pavement

    markings. It also includes an investigation of human perception of the color of pavement markings

    under a variety of conditions and the development of specifications, tolerances for which procedures

    for enforcement can be easily applied by the ODOT.

    The Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE), in 1931, developed a method for specifying

    colors. This method allows for the specification and replication of any color by associating an x and

    y coordinate with that color. Figure 1 shows such a diagram, which includes an artist’s rendering of

    the approximate colors in various locations. This diagram is used by both the ODOT and the Federal

    Highway Administration (FHWA) for specifying the color ranges of proposed pavement color

    specifications and will be used throughout this research. The current pavement marking color

    specifications are spread through a number of sources. Few of these sources provide information on

    supporting research. The earliest specifications for pavement marking materials simply required that

    they be white or yellow, with yellow being reserved to mark no-passing (AASHTO [The American

    Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials], 1954).

    Responses in the color naming experiment were similar for both daytime and nighttime viewing, for

    older and younger subjects, and for a variety of pavement types. The regions in which test

    chromaticities met the criteria for color deficient subjects were larger for white and smaller for

    yellow than for normal vision subjects. These regions were, however, in much the same location.

    These data indicate that, using color coding, the standards that would be suggested from the color

    scaling are probably the best that could be established. The only method of improvement would be

    redundant coding based on some dimension other than color. These results indicate that it is

    reasonable to establish standards and that these standards can be acceptable across a variety of

    conditions and for a range of drivers.

    The contours that were derived from the color scaling data could reasonably be used for a new

    standard. The ODOT, however, would prefer standards that allow a worker to easily and quickly

    determine if a pavement marking being measure in the field conforms. While the established

    contours can be represented by their four corner points, a determination of whether a measurement

    falls within the contour is a bit more complex. The proposed standards, on the other hand, are

    defined by horizontal and vertical lines only, so that there is a range of both x and y values that a

    color must fall within to meet the standard. The ODOT has indicated that they would prefer a

    standard of this type. In keeping with that request, boxes of this sort were established to maximize

    acceptable colors and stay within the contours suggested by the color scaling data. For the white

    markings, the range of x values is 0.33 ± 0.03, and the range of y values is 0.34 ± 0.03. For the

    yellow markings, the range of x values is 0.47 ± 0.03 and the range of y values is 0.47 ± 0.03.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov