Identification of pavement marking colors : executive summary.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Identification of pavement marking colors : executive summary.

Filetype[PDF-12.21 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Executive summary.
    • Abstract:
      The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is charged with selecting and enforcing color

      specifications for pavement markings. In recent years, changes in materials have affected the

      physical appearance of these markings. Even though, at application, the colors meet current federal

      specifications, the specifications themselves are sketchy and, in some cases, given in terms of the

      physical properties of the materials rather than appearance. This method is particularly troublesome

      since the markings are viewed under a variety of lighting conditions and against different colored

      backgrounds (pavement types). Perhaps more of a problem is that current practice requires only a

      subjective evaluation of whether colors are within specification. Recently, the ODOT has also been

      put under a legislative mandate to require that a certain percentage of their contracts contain

      warranties. This mandate makes it necessary to develop appropriate specifications for acceptable

      changes in the color of pavement markings over time. Research is needed to develop these

      specifications with regard to the color appearance properties of markings. They need to be more

      relevant to the needs of the driver than the current specifications, and guidelines for objective

      evaluation need to be provided. This research includes a review of current literature on color,

      perception, and measurement as well as a review of current practices with regard to pavement

      markings. It also includes an investigation of human perception of the color of pavement markings

      under a variety of conditions and the development of specifications, tolerances for which procedures

      for enforcement can be easily applied by the ODOT.

      The Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE), in 1931, developed a method for specifying

      colors. This method allows for the specification and replication of any color by associating an x and

      y coordinate with that color. Figure 1 shows such a diagram, which includes an artist’s rendering of

      the approximate colors in various locations. This diagram is used by both the ODOT and the Federal

      Highway Administration (FHWA) for specifying the color ranges of proposed pavement color

      specifications and will be used throughout this research. The current pavement marking color

      specifications are spread through a number of sources. Few of these sources provide information on

      supporting research. The earliest specifications for pavement marking materials simply required that

      they be white or yellow, with yellow being reserved to mark no-passing (AASHTO [The American

      Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials], 1954).

      Responses in the color naming experiment were similar for both daytime and nighttime viewing, for

      older and younger subjects, and for a variety of pavement types. The regions in which test

      chromaticities met the criteria for color deficient subjects were larger for white and smaller for

      yellow than for normal vision subjects. These regions were, however, in much the same location.

      These data indicate that, using color coding, the standards that would be suggested from the color

      scaling are probably the best that could be established. The only method of improvement would be

      redundant coding based on some dimension other than color. These results indicate that it is

      reasonable to establish standards and that these standards can be acceptable across a variety of

      conditions and for a range of drivers.

      The contours that were derived from the color scaling data could reasonably be used for a new

      standard. The ODOT, however, would prefer standards that allow a worker to easily and quickly

      determine if a pavement marking being measure in the field conforms. While the established

      contours can be represented by their four corner points, a determination of whether a measurement

      falls within the contour is a bit more complex. The proposed standards, on the other hand, are

      defined by horizontal and vertical lines only, so that there is a range of both x and y values that a

      color must fall within to meet the standard. The ODOT has indicated that they would prefer a

      standard of this type. In keeping with that request, boxes of this sort were established to maximize

      acceptable colors and stay within the contours suggested by the color scaling data. For the white

      markings, the range of x values is 0.33 ± 0.03, and the range of y values is 0.34 ± 0.03. For the

      yellow markings, the range of x values is 0.47 ± 0.03 and the range of y values is 0.47 ± 0.03.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26