Effectiveness of cathodic protection : final report, June 30, 2009.
-
2009-06-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final report.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The report provides a summary of Oregon’s experience with cathodic protection of coastal reinforced concrete bridges. ; Thermal-sprayed anodes, foil anodes with a conductive adhesive, and carbon painted anodes are effective in distributing ; current to the steel reinforcement in concrete bridges. A resistive layer develops at the anode-concrete interface with ; increasing electrochemical age, thereby increasing anode polarization. In impressed current cathodic protection (ICCP) ; systems this is reflected in a higher circuit resistance. In sacrificial anode cathodic protection (SACP) systems it results in ; lower current output. Periodic wetting of the anode by rain, fog, and dew is an important factor in reducing anode ; polarization. ; Catalyzed thermal-sprayed titanium anodes under ICCP service develop no significant anode polarization with ; electrochemical age. They perform well in both low and high humidity environments, and exhibit stable long-term ; performance. ; Humectants based on LiNO3 and LiBr promote more effective performance of new and aged anodes in CP systems than ; untreated anodes. In SACP tests, LiBr was more effective ; than LiNO3. In accelerated ICCP, LiNO3 was more effective than LiBr. ; In SACP service, zinc hydrogel anodes produce a stable protection current sufficient to protect reinforcing bar from ; corrosion. There was practically no effect of changing moisture conditions on current production and no evidence of aging ; effects in an Oregon DOT field trial.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha256:2f493643d39b4276bb3ef421f316a17baac8c09e87bcf198d60fede858591ae3