Analysis of the impact of changes to the Wright amendment.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Analysis of the impact of changes to the Wright amendment.

Filetype[PDF-6.41 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) opened in 1974. To ensure its success

      and to provide assurance that the airport could meet its bond obligations, the cities of Dallas and

      Fort Worth agreed to move commercial passenger carrier operations from Love Field (DAL)

      in Dallas and Meacham Field in Fort Worth to Dallas-Fort Worth Airport. At the time, most

      of the major carriers serving the area signed an agreement to transfer. Only Southwest Airlines

      -- then a small, intrastate carrier -- did not sign. The courts subsequently found it eligible to

      continue to provide intrastate service from Love Field. Concern arose that other carriers might

      seek to enter Love Field an provide expanded service, a move which might dilute the service

      and financial standing of Dallas-Fort Worth Airport. The legislative result of that concern was

      the Wright Amendment -- a provision contained in the International Air Transponarion

      Competition Act of 1979 and signed into law in 1980 that expressly prohibits air service

      (including connecting and through-ticketing) between Dallas Love Field and points beyond states

      contiguous to Texas, including Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Oklahoma (See Figure

      1.1).

      Since passage, two views of the impact of the Amendment have developed. Advocates

      of change to the Wright Amendment are concerned that the Amendment's restrictions limit the

      benefits of Southwest's lower fare structure as well as the potential economic contribution of the

      airport. As a result, residents outside the Wright Amendment area, as well as some residents

      of Dallas, have argued for changes to the Amendment in order to allow Southwest to expand its

      operations and provide low-fare service to more cities. Opponents to changing the current

      restrictions believe that removing or changing the current restrictions would violate the original

      agreements that supported construction of Dallas-Fort Worth Airport, divert traffic from the

      airport, thus weakening justification for plans to expand, and would lead to major capacity

      problems.

      To date, proposed Congressional legislation and legal challenges to repeal the Wright

      Amendment have failed. Legal attempts to challenge the constitutionality of the Amendment are

      currently underway.

      The controversial nature of the Wright Amendment led to the creation of a U.S.

      Department of Transportation (DOT) team to conduct a study of the issues that surround the

      Wright Amendment. This team included members from the Office of the Secretary, Federal

      Aviation Administration, Federal Highway Administration, and Urban Mass Transit

      Administration (now the Federal Transit Administration). Contractors (Apogee Research and

      Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff) provided technical support. This study does not

      make any recommendations; instead it evaluates five scenarios and measures the potential effects

      of each scenario on a variety of issues.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26