Volume balance and toxicity analysis of highway storm water discharge from Cross Lake Bridge.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Volume balance and toxicity analysis of highway storm water discharge from Cross Lake Bridge.

Filetype[PDF-220.35 KB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • OCLC Number:
    • Edition:
      Final report; May 2003-Aug. 2009.
    • NTL Classification:
    • Abstract:
      The Cross Lake Bridge in Shreveport, Louisiana, spans Cross Lake that serves as the city’s water supply. Concern

      about accidents on the bridge contaminating the lake prompted the Louisiana Department of Transportation and

      Development (LADOTD) to construct a closed drainage system on the bridge to convey precipitation falling on the

      bridge deck to a concrete lined holding pond on the east side of the lake. Once there, bridge runoff is tested for oil

      and grease, pH, and lead before discharge to 12-mile bayou.

      This report describes the methodology and results of two studies dealing with runoff from the Cross Lake Bridge.

      The first examined the degree to which repairs to the Cross Lake Bridge’s closed drainage system were successful

      in capturing runoff from the bridge. An earlier study found that, because of leakage, only about one half of the

      precipitation falling on the bridge actually ended up in the holding pond. This is substantially less than would be

      expected from a catchment that is essentially impervious. To test the success of repairs to the drainage system,

      volume balances for 22 precipitation events were conducted by comparing the rainfall on the bridge to the

      subsequent flow into the pond. The ratio of the volume of runoff to the volume of precipitation was found to

      average 0.86, which when compared to values from the previous study as well as published values, suggested a

      successful repair of the drainage system.

      The second study examined the use of the Microtox toxicity analysis system manufactured by Azur Environmental

      for use as a screening tool to assess toxicity of the pond contents. Microtox protocols rely on measurement of light

      output from a specific strain of luminescent bacteria. Toxicity is indicated when light output from the bacteria

      decreases. Tests can be run in time periods ranging from 5 to 30 minutes. The standard endpoint of the tests occurs

      once light output has dropped 50 percent and is termed the EC50. Samples from the water column and sediment

      were collected and analyzed for toxicity using the basic test (liquid) and the basic solid phase test (sediment).

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.23