Air traffic control specialist visual scanning II : task load, visual noise, and intrusions into controlled airspace.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Air traffic control specialist visual scanning II : task load, visual noise, and intrusions into controlled airspace.

Filetype[PDF-694.52 KB]


English

Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    Task load, visual noise, and intrusions into controlled airspace
  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Technical note; Dec. 1999.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) started an Air Traffic Control Specialist (ATCS) information-scanning program a number

    of years ago. The goal is to learn about how controllers use information displays and develop techniques for reducing air traffic-related

    errors. This report describes a research project conducted at the Research Development and Human Factors Laboratory of the FAA

    William J. Hughes Technical Center. Volunteer controllers participated in a real-time, air traffic control simulation of airspace

    modeled after their Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facility. ATCSs worked two different levels of simulated traffic.

    Some scenarios contained incursions into their Class C airspace, and overflights provided visual noise. Results indicated that the

    ATCSs’ workload increased with higher traffic loads. However, visual noise had more impact on their perceived workload when things

    were slower and not when they were already busy. An eye tracker recorded eye movements. The visual scanning data included

    fixations, saccades, blinks, and pupil information. Increased traffic loads decreased the number of fixations on the radarscope. The

    increase in task load seemed to divert the ATCSs’ attention to areas other than the scope, most specifically the keyboard, suggesting

    they were spending more time updating flight plans and less time scanning the scope. Controllers developed scanning patterns that

    focused on the areas of highest traffic density. This may be why they identified airspace intrusions late or not at all in some specific

    cases. Such lapses suggest that intrusion targets must be emphasized with color, blinking, or some other means to draw the controllers

    attention from established patterns. This may increase airspace safety. This research provides greater understanding of how ATCSs

    use current information displays. The research results have potential for increasing future ATCS efficiency through improved display

    technology or application of new training techniques.

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov