Accelerated testing for studying pavement design and performance (FY 2003) : evaluation of the chemical stabilized subgrade soil (CISL Experiment No. 12).
-
2008-01-01
Details
-
Alternative Title:Evaluation of the chemical stabilized subgrade soil (CISL Experiment No. 12)
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
- Paving
- Asphalt pavements
- Accelerated tests
- Pavement design
- Pavement performance
- Pavement joints
- Load transfer
- Concrete pavements
- Portland cement concrete
- Strain (Mechanics)
- Pavement cracking Pavements--Kansas--Design and construction
- Pavements, Asphalt--Kansas--Design and construction
- Pavements--Kansas--Performance--Testing
- Pavements, Asphalt--Kansas--Performance--Testing
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final report; Summer 2002-June 2003.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The Midwest States Accelerated Pavement Testing Pooled Fund Program, financed by the highway departments ; of Missouri, Iowa, Kansas and Nebraska, has supported an accelerated pavement testing (APT) project to compare ; the performance of stabilized clayey embankment soil when Portland cement, fly ash, lime and a commercial ; product were used as stabilizing agents. The project aimed to improve the practices related to the design of flexible ; pavements when the top of the subgrade is improved by chemical stabilization. The experiments were conducted ; at the Civil Infrastructure Systems Laboratory (CISL) of Kansas State University. The test program consisted of ; constructing four flexible pavement structures and subjecting them to full-scale accelerated loading test. ; The study indicated that cement and lime are the most effective stabilizers for the studied soil. These stabilizers ; resulted in lower vertical compressive stresses at the top of the subgrade and lower rut depth at the pavement surface ; than the fly ash-treated soil. After more than two million axle load repetitions, the pavement with cement stabilized ; embankment soil exhibited much less surface cracking than the pavement with fly-ash stabilized embankment. ; The commercial product proved not to be effective in stabilizing the non-sulfate clayey soil used in this experiment, ; when the embankment is constructed at the same moisture content and compaction level as for the other three ; chemicals. The unconfined compression strength measured on laboratory prepared samples of soil stabilized with ; the commercial chemical compound was very similar to that of the untreated soil.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:5f0d7aee0580ef446c4d421aeac96ef7edea2ece98e812e5b3ff5e7da64e3809e2080ce999595aac7356abea0c7b505229b9e00870debcf27b690f72241377dd