Welcome to ROSA P | Driver strategies for engaging in distracting tasks using in-vehicle technologies - 16514 | US Transportation Collection
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Driver strategies for engaging in distracting tasks using in-vehicle technologies
  • Published Date:
    2008-03-01
  • Language:
    English
Filetype[PDF-1.80 MB]


Details:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    HS-DOT-810-919
  • Resource Type:
  • Contracting Officer:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-SAFETY AND SECURITY ; NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Human Factors ; NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Highway Safety ;
  • Format:
  • Abstract:
    This project investigated the decision process involved in a driver’s willingness to engage in various technology-related and non-technology tasks. Previous research focused on how well drivers are able to drive while engaged in potentially distracting activities but little work has considered how drivers decide when to engage in in-vehicle activities. The project included focus groups and an on-road study, both employing participants who used in-vehicle technologies, from four age groups: teen (16-18), young (18-24), middle (25-59), and older (60+). For the on-road study, participants drove their own vehicles over a specified route and at specified points they rated their willingness to engage in some specific task at that time and place. Eighty-one different situations (combination of in-vehicle task and driving circumstances) were included. Further information was collected in the take-home booklet completed after the on-road session. Driver willingness to engage in various in-vehicle tasks was related to the technology type, specific task attributes, driving conditions, personal motivations, age, driving style, and decision style. Ratings of willingness and of risk were very highly correlated. Although reported willingness varied substantially with the task it was rather insensitive to immediate roadway characteristics and participants showed relatively little concern for impending (up-road) conditions. Task-related motivations, rather than driving-related considerations, appeared to be dominant decision factors. Participants did not attribute particular risk to basic cell phone tasks (dialing, answering, conversing). These phone tasks were rated roughly comparable to eating something neat or drinking something and were rated less risky than eating something messy or dealing with children in the vehicle. A matrix mapped 36 specific project findings to potential countermeasure approaches, including public education; driver or device user training; user interface design; needs for warnings and information; criteria for function lock-outs; and driver assist system criteria. Some particular countermeasure strategy was suggested for consideration in more than 200 cells in this matrix, so that the findings of the study may prove heuristically fruitful in generating approaches to dealing with driver distraction.

  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
Submit Feedback >