Travel and environmental implications of school siting.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Travel and environmental implications of school siting.

Filetype[PDF-1.30 MB]


English

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    972637
  • OCLC Number:
    77481529
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Over the next few decades, thousands of schools will be built

    or renovated.

    The planning decisions

    around that construction and renovation will have important implications for education and community quality of

    life.

    Recent trends in travel to

    school have raised concerns at

    federal, state, and local levels. In 2001, less than

    15 percent of

    students between the ages of five and

    15 walked to or from

    school,

    and 1 percent biked.

    In

    1969, 48 percent of students walked or biked to

    school. In response, governments

    at every

    level

    have

    launched a variety

    of policy initiatives.

    These include state and local “Safe Routes to School

    Programs,”

    and a federal Kids Walk-to-School Campaign. In addition, a variety of initiatives

    are helping schools stay

    or locate at the center of communities.

    This study evaluates the travel and environmental implications of

    these latter initiatives, and of trends toward constructing schools that are not located at the center of

    communities,

    and are not reachable by

    walking or bicycling. In short, it seeks to find the implications of

    school location for travel and the environment.

    This

    study is the first to

    empirically examine the relationship between

    school location, the built environment

    around schools,

    mode choices for trips to school, and

    air

    emissions impacts of those choices. It finds that:

    1. School proximity to students matters. Students with shorter walk and bike times to or from school are more likely to walk and bike.

    2. The built environment influences travel

    choices.

    Students traveling

    through higher-quality

    environments

    are

    more likely to bicycle and walk.

    3. Because of travel behavior differences, school location has an impact on air emissions. Centrally

    located schools that can be reached by walking and

    bicycling reduce air pollution.

    The results suggest that actions to improve students’ walking environments, and to support communities

    that wish to locate schools in neighborhoods, will result in increases in student

    walking and

    biking to

    school. Increased walking and biking can reduce emissions related to auto travel

    and improve

    environmental quality.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov