Transportation infrastructure : review of project selection process for five FHWA discretionary programs
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Transportation infrastructure : review of project selection process for five FHWA discretionary programs

Filetype[PDF-132.80 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-PLANNING AND POLICY-PLANNING AND POLICY;NTL-ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-Funding;
    • Abstract:
      DOT uses a two-phase process for selecting and funding transportation

      projects for the five discretionary programs we reviewed. In the first

      phase, FHWA program staff in the field and headquarters compile and

      evaluate the applications that states submit for discretionary funding.

      Program staff screen the applications by applying eligibility criteria

      established by statute or administratively. On the basis of written criteria,

      program staff group the projects into four categories that range in priority

      from most promising to not qualified and submit the groupings to the

      Office of the Administrator. The submission to the Office of the

      Administrator provides information on each candidate project, data on

      discretionary funds that each state received during prior years, and the

      current level of congressional interest. In the second phase, the Office of

      the Administrator uses the information submitted by the program staff, as

      well as other factors, to evaluate the projects and make the final

      selections. According to FHWA’s Acting Deputy Administrator, the Office of

      the Administrator has tried to ensure that the dollars are spread fairly

      among all the states and that the interests of Members of Congress are

      addressed. In contrast to the analyses that the program staff complete in

      the first phase, the Office of the Administrator does not document the

      factors it uses to select the final projects or its rationale for making the

      final selections.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26