Transportation infrastructure : review of project selection process for five FHWA discretionary programs
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Transportation infrastructure : review of project selection process for five FHWA discretionary programs

Filetype[PDF-132.80 KB]


English

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-PLANNING AND POLICY-PLANNING AND POLICY;NTL-ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-Funding;
  • Abstract:
    DOT uses a two-phase process for selecting and funding transportation

    projects for the five discretionary programs we reviewed. In the first

    phase, FHWA program staff in the field and headquarters compile and

    evaluate the applications that states submit for discretionary funding.

    Program staff screen the applications by applying eligibility criteria

    established by statute or administratively. On the basis of written criteria,

    program staff group the projects into four categories that range in priority

    from most promising to not qualified and submit the groupings to the

    Office of the Administrator. The submission to the Office of the

    Administrator provides information on each candidate project, data on

    discretionary funds that each state received during prior years, and the

    current level of congressional interest. In the second phase, the Office of

    the Administrator uses the information submitted by the program staff, as

    well as other factors, to evaluate the projects and make the final

    selections. According to FHWA’s Acting Deputy Administrator, the Office of

    the Administrator has tried to ensure that the dollars are spread fairly

    among all the states and that the interests of Members of Congress are

    addressed. In contrast to the analyses that the program staff complete in

    the first phase, the Office of the Administrator does not document the

    factors it uses to select the final projects or its rationale for making the

    final selections.

  • Format:
  • Alternate URL:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov