Alternative materials for subgrade modification
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Alternative materials for subgrade modification

Filetype[PDF-3.29 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Creators:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • TRIS Online Accession Number:
      921447
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Construction and Maintenance;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Materials;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Soils and Geology;
    • Abstract:
      This study examines the laboratory and field performance of two alternative materials used for the modification of unstable (CBR<6) subgrade soils. Modification is temporarily enhancing subgrade

      stability to improve the constructability of successive pavement layers. The alternative materials included a by-product hydrated lime (BHL) and a Class C fly ash (CCFA) meeting the requirements of

      AASHTO M 295. Three experimental projects were constructed incorporating these materials with a variety of soil types. The performance of sections treated with these materials was compared to that of control sections treated with a high calcium lime kiln dust (LKD) or dense graded aggregate, depending on site conditions. Information presented in this study includes laboratory background and

      mix design data, construction procedure evaluation, bearing value and subgrade rut depth data, pavement performance data, and recommended mix design procedures and specifications. The results indicate that BHL and CCFA are acceptable materials for subgrade modification.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26