Current and proposed practices for nondestructive highway pavement testing
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Current and proposed practices for nondestructive highway pavement testing

Filetype[PDF-113.00 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • TRIS Online Accession Number:
      745370
    • OCLC Number:
      38176701
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Materials;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance;
    • Abstract:
      In September 1994 the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) distributed a short survey on nondestructive testing practices to each of the 50 state Departments of Transportation (DOTs). The compilation of results constituted Phase 1 of a multiphase effort intended to lead toward the development of a method for optimizing falling weight deflectometer (FWD) test point spacing. Planned spatial statistical analyses on selected data sets will yield (site-specific) optimal FWD test point spacing for road network evaluation and pavement overlay design. Optimal FWD test point spacing reduces conservative overdesign due to undertesting and reduces overtesting. Both of these ultimately reduce costs. Although the above effort has not been completed, this interim report outlines the proposed process. Also included are direct survey facts and figures, including number of states with nondestructive testing (NDT) devices, average number of miles of annual overlay design, average number of miles of network/inventory testing, and back-calculation programs and overlay design procedures used. All facts and figures are generic and honor state anonymity.
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26