DeCorla-Souza, P., Culp, M., Hunt, J., Cohen, H., & Haling, D. (1997). New Tool for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Evaluating Transportation Alternatives. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13883
DeCorla-Souza, P, M Culp, J Hunt, H Cohen, and D Haling. New Tool for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Evaluating Transportation Alternatives. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration, 1997. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13883.
DeCorla-Souza, P, et al. New Tool for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Evaluating Transportation Alternatives. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration, 1997, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13883.
The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) emphasizes assessment of multi-modal alternatives and demand management strategies. In 1995, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) developed a corridor sketch planning tool called the Sketch Planning Analysis Spreadsheet Model (SPASM) to assist planners in developing the type of economic efficiency and other evaluative information needed for comparing cross-modal and demand management strategies. When more detailed analysis is required, however, SPASM cannot be used directly, owing to several simplifying assumptions. For example, all trips are assumed to be of an average trip length, made between the two ends of the corridor. Also, it is difficult to use SPASM for system wide analysis. To allow more detailed analysis, FHWA has developed an enhanced version of SPASM, called the Surface Transportation Efficiency Analysis Model (STEAM). This paper provides a case study application of the enhanced software in evaluation of corridor alternatives and system plan alternatives for Toledo, Ohio. The case study demonstrates that the new software can be a useful tool in providing information of interest to decision-makers.
DeCorla-Souza, P., Culp, M., Hunt, J., Cohen, H., & Haling, D. (1997). New Tool for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Evaluating Transportation Alternatives. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13883
DeCorla-Souza, P, M Culp, J Hunt, H Cohen, and D Haling. New Tool for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Evaluating Transportation Alternatives. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration, 1997. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13883.
DeCorla-Souza, P, et al. New Tool for Benefit-Cost Analysis in Evaluating Transportation Alternatives. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration, 1997, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/13883.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.