Marine Safety: Current Status of the VTS 2000 Program and Key Stakeholders’ Views on It
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Marine Safety: Current Status of the VTS 2000 Program and Key Stakeholders’ Views on It

Filetype[PDF-124.23 KB]


English

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    00761133
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-MARINE/WATERWAYS TRANSPORTATION-Marine Safety
  • Abstract:
    This is the statement of Gerald L. Dillingham, Associate Director, Transportation and Telecommunications Issues, Resources, Community, and Economic Division before the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, House of Representatives. It discusses the Coast Guard's vessel traffic service (VTS) 2000 program, a proposed initiative to build new or improved VTS systems at up to 17 U.S. ports. VTS systems typically use radar or closed-circuit television linked to a central data-gathering location, called a vessel traffic center. This center monitors vessel traffic in port areas and provides information to vessels in these areas on such matters as marine traffic, tides, weather conditions, and emergencies. This testimony is based on a recently issued report to this Subcommittee and covers four topics: (1) the current status of the Coast Guard's development of VTS 2000, (2) the extent that key stakeholders (shippers operating in the ports, marine pilots, and port officials) support acquiring and funding VTS 2000, (3) the extent that key stakeholders are interested in acquiring and funding lower-cost VTS systems (if they are not supportive of VTS 2000), and (4) other issues that could affect the establishment of privately funded VTS systems. (11 p.)
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov