Comparative Evaluation of 4-Inch and 6-Inch Diameter Specimens for Testing Large Stone Asphalt Mixes
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Comparative Evaluation of 4-Inch and 6-Inch Diameter Specimens for Testing Large Stone Asphalt Mixes

Filetype[PDF-136.25 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Resource Type:
    • TRIS Online Accession Number:
      00625354
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Materials;NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Pavement Management and Performance;
    • Abstract:
      Increased incidence of premature rutting of heavy duty asphalt pavements has

      been experienced in recent years. There is a general agreement among most

      asphalt paving technologists that the use of large size stone in the binder and

      base courses will minimize or eliminate the rutting of heavy duty-pavements.

      However, the wide acceptance of the Marshall and Hveem mix design procedures

      inhibits the use of large stone mixes because these methods use standard 4-inch

      (101.6 mm) diameter specimens and limit the maximum aggregate size to one inch

      (25.4 mm).

      Modified Marshall equipment and Gyratory Testing Machine (GTM) are now available

      for compacting and testing 6-inch (152.4 mm) diameter specimens to accommodate

      aggregate up to 2-inch (50.8 mm) maximum size. However, some agencies continue

      to use 4-inch diameter specimens for mixes containing 1&1/2inch (38.1 mm)

      maximum size aggregate. This study compares the mix properties such as Marshall

      stability and flow, indirect tensile strength, and permanent deformation (from

      static creep test) obtained on 4-inch and 6-inch (101.6 and 152.4 mm) diameter

      specimens. Both Modified Marshall and GTM equipment were used to compact the

      specimens of these two sizes. The maximum aggregate size ranged from 1/2 to

      l&1/2-inches (12.5 to 38.1 mm).

      The test data indicates increased coefficient of variation when testing 4-inch

      (101.6 mm) specimens of the mix containing aggregate larger than one inch

      (25.4 mm) compared to 6-inch (152.4 mm) specimens. The 6-inch (152.4 mm)

      diameter specimens also had lower variability in creep test compared to 4-inch

      (101.6 mm) specimens. Laboratory and rationally derived data indicating the

      ratios by which stability and flow values increased is also given in the paper.

      It has been recommended to use 6-inch (152.4 mm) diameter specimens for large

      stone asphalt mixes.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26