Benefits and Costs of Programmatic Agreements

Details

• Creators:
  Bucci, Gregory ; Rainville, Lydia
• Corporate Creators:
  John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.)
• Corporate Contributors:
  United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Benefit cost analysis
  • Case studies
  • Metrics (Quantitative assessment) Programmatic agreement
  • Programmatic approach
  • Merger process
  • Endangered Species Act
  • National Historic Act
  • National Environmental Policy Act
  • Clean Water Act
• Publication/ Report Number:
  DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-15-07;FHWA-HEP-15-023
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  Kentucky;Oregon;Washington;California;Ohio;Illinois;North Carolina
• Edition:
  Final report
• Corporate Publisher:
  John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (U.S.)
• Abstract:
  The performing organization, on behalf of the FHWA Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty, conducted a benefit-cost assessment of programmatic agreements and approaches. The assessment consisted of a case study approach that evaluated three agreement types within seven States. The results of the analysis indicate that programmatic agreements and approaches are advantageous methods for streamlining process and generating time and cost savings for stakeholders.
• Format:
  PDF
• Funding:
  HW5GA1/NJ257
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/12195/dot_12195_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 365.28 KB]
• Collection(s):
  Volpe Center ; Federal Highway Administration
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:35ae638b75282aff58abe8b61d8f8ad1ed48cd44284ec045659e84e1a7b35e248c4a6c1cb0f0e57306d6efd07285fe3656f3cc5bf4930843541a904ae1d788db