Public-Private Partnership (P3s) concessions are an integrated service delivery approach where a public transportation agency enters a contractual agreement with a private sector entity to deliver a service and/or facility for a specific period. Under the P3 approach, the private sector entity is singly responsible for the design, construction, fin
...
Perez, B., Giordano, R., Woodhouse, M., & Thompson, J. (2016). Report on Highway Public-Private Partnership Concessions in the United States (Report No. FHWA-HIN-17-006). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Innovative Program Delivery. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64188
Perez, Benjamin, Reno Giordano, Matthew Woodhouse, and Jennifer Thompson. Report on Highway Public-Private Partnership Concessions in the United States. Report no. FHWA-HIN-17-006. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Innovative Program Delivery, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64188.
Perez, Benjamin, et al. Report on Highway Public-Private Partnership Concessions in the United States. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Innovative Program Delivery, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HIN-17-006, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64188.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety
2016-12-01
|
PDF
This quick reference guide provides background information on safety performance functions (SPFs) and the need for calibration.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety (2016). The Calibrator: An SPF Calibration and Assessment Tool - Quick Reference Guide (Report No. FHWA-SA-17-017). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50485
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. The Calibrator: An SPF Calibration and Assessment Tool - Quick Reference Guide. Report no. FHWA-SA-17-017. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50485.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety The Calibrator: An SPF Calibration and Assessment Tool - Quick Reference Guide. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016, Report no. FHWA-SA-17-017, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50485.
Connected vehicles (CVs) and automated vehicles (AVs) are two rapidly emerging technologies with the potential to transform our communities and transportation system on a larger scale than anything we have seen since the construction of the U.S. Interstate Highway system. These technologies have justifiably led to high expectations for increased sa
...
Supporting Files
Federal Highway Administration (U.S.) (2016). Environmental Justice Considerations for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Federal Highway Administration (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50872
Federal Highway Administration (U.S.). Environmental Justice Considerations for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Federal Highway Administration (U.S.), 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50872.
Federal Highway Administration (U.S.) Environmental Justice Considerations for Connected and Automated Vehicles. Federal Highway Administration (U.S.), 2016, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50872.
This Manual explains the relevant issues related to fatigue and fracture in steel bridges, including analysis, design, evaluation, repair, and retrofit. Chapter 1 provides an introduction to fatigue and fracture, as well as an introduction to the Reference Manual. Chapter 2 begins with a discussion of cracking in steel structures, including crack b
...
Russo, F., Mertz, D. R., Frank, K. H., & Wilson, K. E. (2016). Design and Evaluation of Steel Bridges for Fatigue and Fracture – Reference Manual (Report No. FHWA-NHI-16-016). National Highway Institute (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42864
Russo, FM, Dennis R. Mertz, Karl H. Frank, and Kenneth E. Wilson. Design and Evaluation of Steel Bridges for Fatigue and Fracture – Reference Manual. Report no. FHWA-NHI-16-016. National Highway Institute (U.S.), 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42864.
Russo, FM, et al. Design and Evaluation of Steel Bridges for Fatigue and Fracture – Reference Manual. National Highway Institute (U.S.), 2016, Report no. FHWA-NHI-16-016, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42864.
P3s concessions are an integrated service delivery approach where a public transportation agency enters a contractual agreement with a private sector entity to deliver a service and/or facility for a specific period. Under the P3 approach, the private sector entity is singly responsible for the design, construction, finance, operations, maintenance
...
Sadasivam, S., Mallela, J., Sawers, A., Little, B., & Binder, S. (2016). Use of Performance Requirements for Design and Construction in Public-Private Partnership Concessions (Report No. FHWA-HIN-17-004). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Innovative Program Delivery. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64190
Sadasivam, Suri, Jagannath Mallela, Alistair Sawers, Bryce Little, and Susan Binder. Use of Performance Requirements for Design and Construction in Public-Private Partnership Concessions. Report no. FHWA-HIN-17-004. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Innovative Program Delivery, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64190.
Sadasivam, Suri, et al. Use of Performance Requirements for Design and Construction in Public-Private Partnership Concessions. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Innovative Program Delivery, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HIN-17-004, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/64190.
This report is the third in a series of four human factors experiments to examine the effects of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) on driver performance in a variety of situations. The experiment reported here was conducted in a driving simulator scenario in which the subject driver was embedded in a platoon of CACC-equipped vehicles. The
...
Inman, V. W., Jackson, S., & Philips, B. H. (2016). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study : Experiment 3 : The Role of Automated Braking and Auditory Alert in Collision Avoidance Response (Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-058). United States. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35846
Inman, Vaughan W., Steven Jackson, and Brian H. Philips. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study : Experiment 3 : The Role of Automated Braking and Auditory Alert in Collision Avoidance Response. Report no. FHWA-HRT-16-058. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35846.
Inman, Vaughan W., et al. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study : Experiment 3 : The Role of Automated Braking and Auditory Alert in Collision Avoidance Response. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HRT-16-058, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35846.
In order to transform a traffic incident management (TIM) program or project from a stand-alone effort to a sustainable core function of an agency, the establishment of a solid business case is necessary. The purpose of this document is to support TIM agencies and partner agencies in the development of a strong business case for their TIM programs,
...
Pecheux, K. K., Shah, V. P., & O'Donnell, C. (2016). Making the Business Case for Traffic Incident Management (Report No. FHWA-HOP-16-084). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42119
Pecheux, Kelley Klaver, Vaishali P. Shah, and Cara O'Donnell. Making the Business Case for Traffic Incident Management. Report no. FHWA-HOP-16-084. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42119.
Pecheux, Kelley Klaver, et al. Making the Business Case for Traffic Incident Management. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HOP-16-084, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42119.
This document provides guidance on Ground Modification Methods, and also serves as the reference manual for FHWA NHI courses No. 132034, 132034A, and 132034B on Ground Modification Methods. The purpose of this manual is to introduce available ground modification methods and applications to design generalists, design specialists, construction engine
...
Schaefer, V. R., Berg, R. R., Christopher, B. R., DiMaggio, J. A., Filz, G. M., Bruce, D. A., Ayala, D., & Collin, J. G. (2016). Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 12 Ground Modification Methods - Reference Manual Volume I (Report No. FHWA-NHI-16-027). National Highway Institute (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40552
Schaefer, Vernon R., Ryan R. Berg, Barry R. Christopher, Jerry A. DiMaggio, George M. Filz, Donald A. Bruce, Daniel Ayala, and James G. Collin. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 12 Ground Modification Methods - Reference Manual Volume I. Report no. FHWA-NHI-16-027. National Highway Institute (U.S.), 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40552.
Schaefer, Vernon R., et al. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 12 Ground Modification Methods - Reference Manual Volume I. National Highway Institute (U.S.), 2016, Report no. FHWA-NHI-16-027, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40552.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology
2016-12-01
|
PDF
This summary report focuses on some of the key findings that resulted from the investigation of the deck of the bridge selected for participation in the Long-Term Bridge Performance (LTBP) Program pilot study located in New Jersey (“New Jersey pilot bridge”). Constructed and opened to traffic in 1969, the bridge has a multigirder steel superstructu
...
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology (2016). FHWA LTBP Pilot Study Summary—Findings From The New Jersey Bridge Deck (Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-070). United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40360
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. FHWA LTBP Pilot Study Summary—Findings From The New Jersey Bridge Deck. Report no. FHWA-HRT-16-070. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40360.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology FHWA LTBP Pilot Study Summary—Findings From The New Jersey Bridge Deck. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HRT-16-070, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40360.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety
2016-12-01
|
PDF
FHWA published the Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool (Systemic Tool) in 2013 and, given the condition of the practice at that time, most discussion and examples were based on rural applications and were located along a system with strong supporting data for crashes and road system characteristics. Since publication of the original Systemic Saf
...
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety (2016). Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies (Report No. FHWA-SA-17-002). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies. Report no. FHWA-SA-17-002. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool Supplemental Case Studies. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016, Report no. FHWA-SA-17-002, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42851.
The Roadway Data Improvement Program provides States with a means to assess the quality of their roadway inventory information. From 2013 to 2016 a technical assistance team visited 13 State and Federal entities. They noted findings of current practices and developed recommendations to improve data collection, technical standards, data analysis too
...
Chandler, B. E., Smadi, O. G., & Cheema, A. (2016). Roadway Data Improvement Program Technical Assistance: Final Project Report (Report No. FHWA-SA-17-027). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50493
Chandler, Brian E., Omar G. Smadi, and Adil Cheema. Roadway Data Improvement Program Technical Assistance: Final Project Report. Report no. FHWA-SA-17-027. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50493.
Chandler, Brian E., et al. Roadway Data Improvement Program Technical Assistance: Final Project Report. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016, Report no. FHWA-SA-17-027, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50493.
This report summarizes the independent assessment of the effectiveness and lessons learned from roadside motor carrier compliance systems including assessment of the Smart Roadside Initiative (SRI) Prototype and other SRI-like technologies. The locations selected for the assessment were Grass Lake, Michigan; West Friendship, Maryland; Lyon and Simp
...
El-Nashar, A., Zavagnini, F., Troup, K., Leonard, D., Mollaghasemi, M., & Fayez, S. (2016). Impact Assessment of the Smart Roadside Initiative (SRI) Prototype – Final Report (Report No. FHWA-JPO-17-495). United States. Department of Transportation. Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32052
El-Nashar, Ahmed, Fabio Zavagnini, Kenneth Troup, Dan Leonard, Mansooreh Mollaghasemi, and Sam Fayez. Impact Assessment of the Smart Roadside Initiative (SRI) Prototype – Final Report. Report no. FHWA-JPO-17-495. United States. Department of Transportation. Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32052.
El-Nashar, Ahmed, et al. Impact Assessment of the Smart Roadside Initiative (SRI) Prototype – Final Report. United States. Department of Transportation. Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office, 2016, Report no. FHWA-JPO-17-495, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32052.
The Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks report is a resource and idea book intended to help small towns and rural communities support safe, accessible, comfortable, and active travel for people of all ages and abilities. It provides a bridge between existing guidance on bicycle and pedestrian design and rural practice, encourages innovation in
...
Dickman, D., Gastaldi, G., Cheng, C., Jones, B., Ward, C., Morrill, P., Chesston, C., Walker, W., Portelance, J., Durrant, S., & Gilpin, J. (2016). Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks (Report No. FHWA-HEP-17-024). United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36765
Dickman, Dana, Gena Gastaldi, Cat Cheng, Bryan Jones, Chloe Ward, Prescott Morrill, and Collin Chesston, et al.. Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks. Report no. FHWA-HEP-17-024. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36765.
Dickman, Dana, et al. Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Planning, Environment, and Realty, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HEP-17-024, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36765.
The objective of this project was to investigate the relationship between crashes and buffer-separated manage lane dimensions. The results from several previous research studies have demonstrated that reductions in freeway lane width or shoulder width are associated with more crashes. A wider managed lane envelope widths (i.e., left shoulder, manag
...
Fitzpatrick, K., & Avelar, R. (2016). Safety Implications of Managed Lane Cross Sectional Elements (Report No. FHWA-HOP-16-076). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42527
Fitzpatrick, Kay and Raul Avelar. Safety Implications of Managed Lane Cross Sectional Elements. Report no. FHWA-HOP-16-076. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42527.
Fitzpatrick, Kay, and Raul Avelar Safety Implications of Managed Lane Cross Sectional Elements. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HOP-16-076, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42527.
This study set out to examine the following diverse questions regarding cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) use: - Does CACC reduce driver workload relative to manual gap control? - Does CACC increase the probability of driver distraction relative to manual gap control? - Does CACC result in reduced driver arousal relative to manual gap cont
...
Inman, V. W., Jackson, S., & Philips, B. H. (2016). Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study : Experiment 1 - Workload, Distraction, Arousal, and Trust (Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-056). United States. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35841
Inman, Vaughan W., Steven Jackson, and Brian H. Philips. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study : Experiment 1 - Workload, Distraction, Arousal, and Trust. Report no. FHWA-HRT-16-056. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35841.
Inman, Vaughan W., et al. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Human Factors Study : Experiment 1 - Workload, Distraction, Arousal, and Trust. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 2016, Report no. FHWA-HRT-16-056, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/35841.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations
2016-12-01
|
Urban Congestion Report (UCR)
|
PDF
The Urban Congestion Report (UCR) is produced on a quarterly basis and characterizes the most recent traffic congestion and reliability trends at the national and city level. Each quarterly UCR compares data from the most recent three months to the same three months in the previous year.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations (2016). Urban Congestion Report (UCR): A Snapshot of Year-to-Year Congestion Trends in the U.S. for October through December 2016. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50596
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations. Urban Congestion Report (UCR): A Snapshot of Year-to-Year Congestion Trends in the U.S. for October through December 2016. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50596.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations Urban Congestion Report (UCR): A Snapshot of Year-to-Year Congestion Trends in the U.S. for October through December 2016. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Operations, 2016, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/50596.
This document provides guidance on Ground Modification Methods, and also serves as the reference manual for FHWA NHI courses No. 132034, 132034A, and 132034B on Ground Modification Methods. The purpose of this manual is to introduce available ground modification methods and applications to design generalists, design specialists, construction engine
...
Schaefer, V. R., Berg, R. R., Christopher, B. R., DiMaggio, J. A., Filz, G. M., Bruce, D. A., Ayala, D., & Collin, J. G. (2016). Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 13 Ground Modification Methods - Reference Manual Volume II (Report No. FHWA-NHI-16-028). National Highway Institute (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40553
Schaefer, Vernon R., Ryan R. Berg, Barry R. Christopher, Jerry A. DiMaggio, George M. Filz, Donald A. Bruce, Daniel Ayala, and James G. Collin. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 13 Ground Modification Methods - Reference Manual Volume II. Report no. FHWA-NHI-16-028. National Highway Institute (U.S.), 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40553.
Schaefer, Vernon R., et al. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 13 Ground Modification Methods - Reference Manual Volume II. National Highway Institute (U.S.), 2016, Report no. FHWA-NHI-16-028, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40553.
The purpose of this project was to demonstrate the capture of pavement marking retro-reflectivity measurement data—regardless of various environmental, marking and road condition issues—to allow transportation agencies to make timely and appropriate decisions in managing their pavement marking assets. The MRU described in this proposal addresses ea
...
Lee, T. (2016). Advanced Methods for Mobile Retro-reflectivity Measurement on Pavement Marking Final Report (Report No. FHWA-17-CAI-001). Federal Highway Administration (U.S.). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54370
Lee, Terry. Advanced Methods for Mobile Retro-reflectivity Measurement on Pavement Marking Final Report. Report no. FHWA-17-CAI-001. Federal Highway Administration (U.S.), 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54370.
Lee, Terry Advanced Methods for Mobile Retro-reflectivity Measurement on Pavement Marking Final Report. Federal Highway Administration (U.S.), 2016, Report no. FHWA-17-CAI-001, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/54370.
The Roadway Data Extraction Technical Assistance Program (RDETAP) assists state and local agencies with the expansion and enhancement of roadway data inventories with regard to the Model Inventory of Roadway Elements (MIRE) and other roadway data elements.The RDETAP developed a management information system called the Roadway Data Extraction (RDE)
...
Kraus, E., Le, J., & Sharma, S. (2016). Roadway Data Extraction Tool User Guide (Report No. FHWA-SA-17-029). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49561
Kraus, Edgar, Jerry Le, and Sushant Sharma. Roadway Data Extraction Tool User Guide. Report no. FHWA-SA-17-029. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49561.
Kraus, Edgar, et al. Roadway Data Extraction Tool User Guide. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety, 2016, Report no. FHWA-SA-17-029, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/49561.
Transportation plays a critical role in enhancing access to education, jobs, healthcare, recreation, leisure, and other activities. The United States Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) Accessible Transportation Technology Research Initiative (ATTRI) program leads the research, development, and implementation of transformative technologies, so
...
Sundararajan, S., Bahrami, A., Kandarpa, R., Bishop, R., Dias, B., & Schweiger, C. (2016). USDOT ATTRI Program: International Innovation Coordination Plan (Report No. FHWA-JPO-17-499). United States. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4375
Sundararajan, Sudharson, Arris Bahrami, Ram Kandarpa, Richard Bishop, Bernardine Dias, and Carol Schweiger. USDOT ATTRI Program: International Innovation Coordination Plan. Report no. FHWA-JPO-17-499. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 2016. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4375.
Sundararajan, Sudharson, et al. USDOT ATTRI Program: International Innovation Coordination Plan. United States. Federal Highway Administration, 2016, Report no. FHWA-JPO-17-499, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4375.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.