Details:

Creators:
Balakumaran, Soundar S.G. ; Weyers, Richard E. ; Brown, Michael Carey
Balakumaran, Soundar S.G. ; Weyers, Richard E. ; Brown, Michael Carey Less -
Corporate Creators:
Virginia Transportation Research Council
Corporate Contributors:
Virginia. Dept. of Transportation ; United States. Federal Highway Administration. Virginia Division
Virginia. Dept. of Transportation ; United States. Federal Highway Administration. Virginia Division Less -
Subject/TRT Terms:
[+]
Bridge Decks Overlays (Pavements) Performance Rehabilitation (Maintenance) Service Life
Publication/ Report Number:
FHWA/VTRC 17-R17
Resource Type:
Tech Report
Geographical Coverage:
United States ; Virginia
United States ; Virginia Less -
OCLC Number:
990340475
Corporate Publisher:
Virginia Transportation Research Council
Abstract:
Maintaining the existing transportation infrastructure is a major concern of the Virginia Department of Transportation

(VDOT). The increased user travel costs, safety concerns, and financial burdens involved in replacing deteriorating decks are

reasons for finding appropriate rehabilitation actions that can safely extend the service life of structures.

Virginia has been a leader in employing overlays as a rehabilitation method for bridge decks. VDOT’s Manual of the

Structure and Bridge Division contains guidance for the decision-making process related to maintenance and repair of structures.

Yet there is a need to update the guidelines based on contemporary experience and the knowledge gained through technological

advances.

This report presents and discusses the preliminary findings of Phase I of a multi-phase study to determine the

performance of bridge deck overlays in Virginia. Phase I focused on obtaining information regarding the experiences of VDOT’s

nine districts with regard to their use of different kinds of overlays and the factors that influence which overlays are used. In

addition, VDOT’s bridge inventory was analyzed to gain an understanding of the types of overlay systems used in Virginia.

The overlay types identified to be the most commonly used by the nine VDOT districts were latex-modified concrete,

epoxy concrete, silica fume concrete, very-early-strength latex-modified concrete, and hot-mix asphalt concrete with a waterresistant

membrane. From interviews, wide ranges in service life, even for the same overlay type, were found in every VDOT

district. The performance of overlays, irrespective of the type, was highly dependent on the construction workmanship and the

attention paid to the crucial details. Another commonly observed influential factor was the degree of deck damage (i.e.,

deterioration) that existed when the overlay was installed; the higher the pre-overlay deck damage, the worse the performance of

the overlay.

The study recommends that a Phase II study be conducted that will involve an investigation of the overlays for bridges in

VDOT’s bridge inventory, including a review of inspection reports and a field survey of a selected number of bridge decks. The

study further recommends that factors identified in the Phase I study, such as age of overlays, traffic volume, and salt usage, be

taken into account when the bridges are selected. The results will support appropriate modifications to the bridge maintenance

guidelines as they pertain to deck overlays in VDOT’s Manual of the Structure and Bridge Division.


Format:
PDF
Funding:
105230
Collection(s):
US Transportation Collection
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:a1cd6a0a961698cac5b69031f35807230caecd99aef65bc9ab7915e5bde66ab4
Download URL:
https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32335/dot_32335_DS1.pdf
File Type:

Supporting Files

• No Additional Files

More +