Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Rock stream stability structures in the vicinity of bridges.

Filetype[PDF-2.92 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Corporate Publisher:
    • Abstract:
      This report was sponsored by the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) to determine if rock stream stability structures could be used as

      scour countermeasures and to protect streambanks. Traditional scour countermeasures, such as rock riprap, are effective in minimizing erosion but may not

      provide the best aquatic habitat. UDOT is interested in finding countermeasures that are effective in minimizing erosion at design flows and also benefit

      the aquatic habitat.

      David Rosgen, a specialist in fluvial geomorphology, has developed restoration structures that are friendly for aquatic habitat and also provide

      streambank protection and stream stability. These structures are the J-Hook Vane, Cross-Vane and W-Weir. Based on the findings outlined in this report,

      Cross-Vanes and W-Weirs can help protect bridges because they will protect both sides of a streambank while also providing grade control of the

      streambed.

      For stream stability structures to withstand design flows and shear stresses experienced near bridges, they should follow the design guidelines

      specified in this report. One of the most important design guidelines is that the structures discussed in this report have an attached portion of floodplain

      where the structure meets the streambank. This portion of floodplain area can help to disperse the energy of the flow, thereby reducing shear stresses at

      abutments.

      Cross-Vanes and W-Weirs can help protect bridges and other infrastructure against scour by reducing shear stresses at piers and abutments at

      the design flood event. To further investigate their use as a scour countermeasure, it is recommended that this type structure be installed near a bridge

      following this report’s design criteria.UDOT believes that Cross-Vanes and W-Weirs should not be used as a primary scour countermeasure and that rock

      riprap (or other equivalent structural countermeasure) should be used as the primary protection for bridge foundations, abutments and piers.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26