Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Advanced bridge safety initiative, task 1 : development of improved analytical load rating procedures for flat-slab concrete bridges - a thesis and guidelines.

Filetype[PDF-3.88 MB]


  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Creators:
    • Corporate Creators:
      University of Maine
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
      ME 14-06
    • Resource Type:
      Tech Report
    • Geographical Coverage:
      Maine
    • Corporate Publisher:
      Maine. Dept. of Transportation
    • Abstract:
      Current AASHTO provisions for the conventional load rating of flat slab bridges rely on the equivalent strip method

      of analysis for determining live load effects, this is generally regarded as overly conservative by many professional

      engineers. As a result there are a significant number of slab bridges in Maine that are (or will be) posted for reduced

      truck weights, when in reality such postings may not be necessary.

      The objective of this study is to verify a program called SlabRate which was created using MATLAB, a numerical

      computing tool and explore the potential benefits of using it over the conventional strip width method. SlabRate

      computes the rating factors for simply-supported, continuous flat slab bridges using finite element analysis (FEA).

      The verification includes creating parallel models of identical bridges in both SlabRate and the commercial

      software, and comparing the maximum moments and locations of those moments due to a variety of live and dead

      loads. These models were used to assess SlabRate’s finite-element implementation and verify the assumptions that

      are used in SlabRate. In addition to using commercial software to verify SlabRate, live load testing of a reinforced

      flat-slab concrete bridge was done, these results were then compared with the predictions of SlabRate. To explore

      the potential benefits of using SlabRate over the conventional strip width, twenty existing bridges were load rated

      using both. Twenty one different truck configurations were analyzed, these include AASHTO’s design and legal

      trucks, along with AASHTO’s specialized hauling vehicles and MaineDoT’s rating trucks.

      The results from comparing SlabRate to commercial models and the live load test showed that its finite element

      implementation is correct for evaluating simply-supported and continuous flat slab bridges. It was also concluded

      that SlabRate can be reliably used to load rate flat slab bridges having skew angles of 20° or less. Only fourteen

      bridges of the original twenty bridges met this criteria, of which seven would have rating factors above one using

      SlabRate while below one using the conventional strip width method

    • Format:
      PDF
    • Funding:
      20100506*5729
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26