Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Steel plate girder diaphragm and cross bracing loads.

Filetype[PDF-4.94 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The wide spectrum of options available to designers for analyzing and determining cross-frame forces can be a

      source of problems because different options may not result in similar solutions. The main objective of this

      project was to develop a set of recommendations and procedures and instructions to address analysis, design, and

      construction issues related to braces in steel I-girder bridges.

      Different methods that can be used to calculate brace loads are categorized and discussed in detail to identify the

      strengths and limitations of each method. The traditional 2D-grid analyses that are often used by commercial

      software packages ( such as MDX and DESCUS) does not take into account the full warping stiffness, resulting in

      underestimation of torsional stiffness of the girders. Although improved 2D-grid analyses may result in an

      improved representation of the full warping stiffness, these models are generally applicable to a no-load fit

      condition for cross-frames or diaphragms. The procedure by which 2D-grid analyses can be used for calculating

      cross-frame forces and other structural responses of bridges detailed with dead load detailing methods (erected fit

      and final fit) are described. It has been found that performance of improved and traditional 2D-grid analyses also

      depends on the framing layout (contiguous or staggered). Improved 2D-grid analyses are preferred for calculating

      the cross-frame forces because of the satisfactory performance for most of the framing layouts. A relatively

      simple method of simulating lack-of-fit is introduced in this report which makes use of models using three-dimensional (3D) finite element method (FEM). Although past studies have recommended using initial strain to

      simulate lack-of-fit in the cross-frames, this method can be tedious and complex. The proposed method makes

      use of element birth and death techniques to activate or deactivate the cross-frame elements to obtain a measure of

      the force or deformation at specific desired stages. The element birth and death method is generally more simple

      than the initial-strain methods with the essentially the same level of accuracy. Finally, different options for

      framing layouts, detailing methods, cross-frame configurations, and design methods for sizing the cross-frame

      members are discussed.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26