Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Sustainability of bridge foundations using electrical resistivity imaging and induced polarization to support transportation safety.

Filetype[PDF-11.87 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      As of September 2007, there were 67,240 U.S. bridges in the National Bridge Inventory classified as having unknown

      foundations (FHWA 2008). The bridges spanning rivers are of critical importance due to the risks of potential scour. In fact, it is

      estimated that 60 percent of all bridge collapses are due to scour (Parola et al. 1997). Not only are these failures costly, they can be

      deadly for the traveling public. On April 5, 1987, 10 people were killed in New York when a pier collapsed on the Schoharie

      Creek Bridge causing two spans of the deck to fall into the creek. Several other fatal collapses have occurred since the Schoharie

      Creek Bridge failure. Detecting scour is only part of the assessment that must take place to determine risk of failure and knowing

      the foundation depth is a critical component of the assessment.

      This research explored the feasibility and effectiveness of induced polarization (IP) and electrical resistivity imaging

      (ERI), near surface geophysical methods, for determining the depth of unknown foundations. With budget cuts and deteriorating

      infrastructure, there is a need to seek alternative solutions for nondestructive structural integrity testing that are more robust to limit

      bridge failures that hinder transportation safety. The existing methods for unknown bridge foundations in the literature are often

      hindered by the type of foundation or require the use of a borehole, making them very costly. As a result, only a few states are

      working to identify the depth of unknown bridge foundations around them. In order to solve this national problem, a new and

      effective method needs to be investigated with full scale bridge testing and disseminated nationwide. In this work, an experimental

      study was conducted at a National Geotechnical Experimentation Site (NGES) to identify key parameters for the testing design and

      setup in order to obtain optimal surveys of bridge foundations. The conclusions of the NGES investigations were used to plan the

      field surveys on four bridges with known foundations. The outcomes of the four bridges showed that IP and ERI can be used in

      concert with one another to estimate the type and depth of bridge foundations. The results of the field surveys were used to create

      a probability of non-exceedance curve for future predictions of unknown bridge foundations using the methods described in this

      research. Finally, the probability of exceedance curve was used to validate the method with testing on a foundation unknown at

      the time of testing, and the use of IP and ERI were extended to other subsurface infrastructure when a gas line was imaged

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26