Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Freeway work zone lane capacity.

Filetype[PDF-3.98 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • NTL Classification:
      NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION;NTL-OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS-Congestion;NTL-OPERATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS-Traffic Flow;
    • Abstract:
      The focus of this report is a capacity analysis of two long-term urban freeway Work Zones. Work Zone #1

      tapered four mainline lanes to two, using two separate tapers; Work Zone #2 tapered two mainline lanes to one.

      Work Zone throughput was analyzed throughout the day over multiple days and traffic operations conditions

      were analyzed up to a distance of five miles upstream of the Work Zone entrance. Historical data from

      pavement-embedded detectors were used to analyze traffic conditions. The database consisted of five-minute

      volume, speed and occupancy data collected from 78 detectors for a total of 50 days.

      Congestion during each analyzed Work Zone existed for more than fourteen hours each day; Work Zone

      impacts adversely affected freeway operations over distances of 3.7 to 4.2 miles. Speed and occupancy

      conditions further upstream were, however, not affected, or even improved due to significant trip diversion.

      Work Zone capacity was defined based on the maximum traffic flows observed over a one-hour period;

      throughput values were also compiled over longer periods of time when traffic was within 90% of the maximum

      observed one-hour flows, as well as over the multi-hour mid-day period. The Highway Capacity Manual

      freeway capacity definition based on the maximum observed 15-min period was not used, since it would have

      no practical application in estimating Work Zone throughput when congested conditions prevail for the majority

      of the hours of the day.

      Certain noteworthy changes took place for the duration of the analyzed Work Zones: per-lane throughput

      dropped; morning peak periods started earlier, evening peak periods ended later and lasted longer; mid-day

      volumes dropped accompanied by the highest occupancies of the day. Trip diversion was evident in lower

      volumes entering the analyzed freeway corridor, higher volumes using off-ramps and lower volumes using onramps

      upstream of the Work Zones. The majority of diverted traffic comprised smaller vehicles (vehicles up to

      21 feet in length); combination truck volumes increased and their use of the median lane increased, contrary to

      smaller vehicles that shifted toward a heavier use of the shoulder lane.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26