Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Water quality implications of culvert repair options : cementitious and polyurea spray-on liners.

Filetype[PDF-476.52 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Abstract:
      Many commonly used culvert rehabilitation technologies entail the use of a resin or coating that cures to form a rigid

      liner within the damaged culvert. However, the potential environmental impacts of leaching or release of contaminants during

      normal installation practices have not been well studied. Evaluations of previous culvert repair operations by the Virginia

      Department of Transportation (VDOT) were conducted for conventional (styrene-based) cured-in-place pipe and fold and form

      repair technologies. The study reported herein included an evaluation of two additional technologies available for use by VDOT:

      a polymer-enhanced cement mortar (or cementitious) spray-on liner and a polyurea spray-on liner.

      To evaluate the potential for these lining technologies to impact water quality, installations were monitored up to 49

      days. Three water quality tests were conducted for each installation, and water samples were analyzed for water quality

      indicators and constituents listed in material safety data sheets. Tests included a water flow simulation with low dilution

      potential; an immersion test to simulate a standing water scenario; and a laboratory leaching test. Results were then compared

      against established regulatory standards and published toxicity criteria for aquatic species.

      For the cementitious spray-on liner evaluated, pH and alkalinity exceeded specified Virginia water standards in

      laboratory tests but pH and other evaluated compounds were within the acceptable range in water flow and immersion tests. For

      the polyurea spray-on liner evaluated, elevated water quality indicators (i.e., biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen

      demand, total organic carbon, and total nitrogen) in laboratory tests suggested that contaminants were released from the polyurea

      liner, particularly during its initial contact with water, but water quality impacts were not detected in the other tests. Water flow,

      dilution, and volatilization appear to play an important role in reducing water quality impacts from contaminant leaching.

      The study recommends that VDOT specifications include protective controls for spray-on liners to prevent exceeding

      water quality standards or toxicity thresholds for aquatic species in receiving waters with low flows and little dilution potential.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26