Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt : final report, June 2009.

Filetype[PDF-891.33 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report; Jan. 2007-June 2009.
    • Abstract:
      One of the most critical parameters needed for the upcoming Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide

      (MEPDG) is the dynamic modulus (E*), which will be used for flexible pavement design. The dynamic modulus

      represents the stiffness of the asphalt material when tested in a compressive-type, repeated load test. The

      dynamic modulus is one of the key parameters used to evaluate both rutting and fatigue cracking distresses in

      the MEPDG. The computer software that accompanies the MEPDG also provides general default parameters for

      the dynamic modulus (i.e. – Level 2 and 3 inputs). However, caution has already been issued by the National

      Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) researchers as to the appropriateness of these parameters

      for regional areas. The major concern is that state agencies will use these default values blindly and sacrifice

      accuracy of the design. Hence, making the new mechanistic procedure no better than using a structural number

      (SN) with the old AASHTO method.

      There were three primary objectives of the research study. First, the current version of the dynamic modulus

      test, AASHTO TP62-07, was evaluated to determine the relative precision of the test method, and if required,

      recommend a modified procedure with better precision. The second objective of the study was to develop a

      dynamic modulus catalog for use with the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) by testing

      plant-produced and laboratory-compacted samples of various asphalt mixtures. This would supercede Level 2

      inputs currently in the MEPDG for New Jersey. The third primary objective of the research study was to assess

      the accuracy of two commonly utilized dynamic modulus prediction equations; 1) Witczak Prediction Equation

      and 2) Hirsch Model. The database developed during the study also led to the development of correlations

      between dynamic modulus and fatigue cracking and rutting performance of asphalt mixtures.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26