Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Concrete deck performance relative to air entrainment.

Filetype[PDF-6.55 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Creators:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final.
    • Abstract:
      Damage to concrete due to freeze-thaw (F-T) action is a serious concern for agencies in cold regions of the United

      States. The most effective method to protect concrete from F-T damage is through the addition of an air entraining

      agent as an admixture that creates a well distributed, closely spaced, small sized air void system in the concrete. Air

      content measurement in fresh concrete is a routine quality control and acceptance test procedure that helps to ensure

      good durability characteristics in the concrete structure. Most agencies, including the Colorado DOT (CDOT), in

      accordance with industry recommendations, perform the air content measurement at the point of placement in a

      concrete structure. Between 1993 and 2008, CDOT changed its specifications due to safety considerations of the field

      personnel. Air content measurements were performed at the point of delivery during this period. While structures built

      during this period did meet specifications, it is not clear whether the pumping and the placement operations altered the

      air void distribution. For planning future maintenance activities, CDOT was interested in evaluating the relative

      condition of bridge decks built under the point of delivery specification and verifying if they indeed possessed good FT

      durability.

      After a throrough review of 600 bridges in CDOT’s database, six bridges in the Denver metro area in districts 1and 4

      were selected for study. NBI ratings for the selected bridges ranged from 5 to 7. Three of the bridge decks were

      constructed before 1993 (using the point of placement specification), and three were constructed between 1993 and

      2008 (using the point of delivery specification). Three cores from each structure were extracted, and two cores were

      tested as part of the forensic evaluation plan set up for this study. The tests included petrographic analysis as per

      ASTM C 856, air void analyses and total air content determination (including specific surface and spacing factor) as

      per ASTM C 457, and chloride profile measurement at three different depths as per ASTM 1152. The test results

      indicate that the bridge decks built under both specifications have an acceptable air void system and that the bridges

      built under the point of delivery specification have better F-T resistance than the structures built under the point of

      placement specification. This implies that good materials and construction practices were used and there is no

      alarming difference in the quality of bridge decks built under the two specifications. This does not suggest, however,

      that the point of delivery specification should be adopted. The sample size selected for this study is very small, and the

      results need to be interpreted with care.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26