Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Performance assessment of warm mix asphalt (WMA) pavements.

Filetype[PDF-5.08 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Technical report.
    • Abstract:
      Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) is a new technology that was introduced in Europe in 1995. WMA offers several advantages over

      conventional asphalt concrete mixtures, including: reduced energy consumption, reduced emissions, improved or more uniform

      binder coating of aggregate which should reduce mix surface aging, and extended construction season in temperate climates.

      Three WMA techniques, Aspha-min, Sasobit, and Evotherm, were used to reduce the viscosity of the asphalt binder at certain

      temperatures and to dry and fully coat the aggregates at a lower production temperature than conventional hot mix asphalt. The

      reduction in mixing and compaction temperatures of asphalt mixtures leads to a reduction in both fuel consumption and emissions.

      This research project had two major components, the outdoor field study on SR541 in Guernsey County and the indoor study in

      the Accelerated Pavement Load Facility (APLF). Each study included the application of four types of asphalt surface layer,

      including standard hot mix asphalt as a control and three warm mixes: Evotherm, Aspha-min, and Sasobit. The outdoor study

      began with testing of the preexisting pavement and subgrade, the results of which indicated that while the pavement and subgrade

      were not uniform, there were no significant problems or variations that would be expected to lead to differences in performance of

      the planned test sections. During construction, the outdoor study included collection of emissions samples at the plant and on the

      construction site as well as thermal readings from the site. Afterwards, the outdoor study included the periodic collection and

      laboratory analysis of core samples and visual inspections of the road. Roughness (IRI) measurements were made shortly after

      construction and after a year of service.

      The indoor study involved the construction of four lanes of perpetual pavement, each topped with one of the test mixes. The

      lanes were further divided into northern and southern halves, with the northern halves having a full 16 in (40 cm) perpetual

      pavement, and with the southern halves with thicknesses decreasing in one in (2.5 cm) increments by reducing the intermediate

      layer. The dense graded aggregate base was increased to compensate for the change in pavement thickness. The southern half of

      each lane was instrumented to measure temperature, subgrade pressure, deflection relative to top of subgrade and to a point 5 ft (1.5

      m) down, and longitudinal and transverse strains at the base of the fatigue resistance layer (FRL). The APLF had the temperature

      set to 40°F (4.4°C), 70°F (21.1°C), and 104°F (40°C), in that order. At each temperature, rolling wheel loads of 6000 lb (26.7 kN),

      9000 lb (40 kN), and 12,000 lb (53.4 kN) were applied at lateral shifts of 3 in (76 mm), 1 in (25 mm), -4 in (-102 mm), and -9 in (-

      229 mm) and the response measured. Then each plane was subjected to 10,000 passes of the rolling wheel load of 9000 lb (40 kN)

      at about 5 mph (8 km/h). Profiles were measured after 100, 300, 1000, 3000, and 10,000 passes with a profilometer to assess

      consolidation of each surface. After the 10,000 passes of the rolling wheel load were completed, a second set of measurements was

      made under rolling wheel loads of 6000 lb (26.7 kN), 9000 lb (40 kN), and 12,000 lb (53.4 kN) at the same lateral shifts as before.

      Additionally, the response of the pavement instrumentation was recorded during drops of a Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD).

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26