Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

I-66--a case study

Filetype[PDF-2.19 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      I-66, a case study
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Arlington-Fairfax County section of 1-66 is similar to many

      urban highway projects, yet in many ways this project represents a

      milestone in urban transportation planning. 1-66, not unlike many

      others, required non-technical political groups to make difficult,

      technically complex decisions. These decisions took place over a

      long period of time, 1959-1979, during which the information base, as

      well as public attitudes reflected by local governmental poiicies•

      shifted. The decision process encompassed a large number of political

      jurisdictions from the federal level to the community civic associations,

      as well as a wide range of special interest groups varying in

      size from federal departm, ents to environmental action groups. Finally,

      the poliical process when faced with a very controversial decision•

      tried to hide behind its trusted friends; delay, debate and study.

      In spite of all of this, the project and its history are

      The final 1-66 facility, marked by litigation, build and no-build

      decisions and intense adversarial debate, would not be recognized

      by the 1959 highway planner. Some of the many individuals and groups

      which opposed the project claimed that they did not have an impact on

      the final result. Granted, these groups did not stop the project;

      however, the final design was altered dramatically by their opposition.

      1-66 was conceived and born during the 1950's highway era

      characterized by domestic preoccupation with congestion, the decay

      of the central city and flight to Zhe suburbs, it survived the late

      1960's and 1970's rebirth of transit age including citizen involvement,

      concern for the environment and the ener• crisis. The project

      survived by adapting and changing its role from a Los Angeles freeway

      to a multi-modal, •traffic managed facility.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26