U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Structural Crashworthiness Standards Comparison: Grade Crossing Collision Scenarios

File Language:
English


Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    In support of the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) ; Railroad Equipment Safety Program, American and European ; grade-crossing collision scenarios were evaluated and ; compared. Finite element analyses (FEA) were employed to ; subject an FRA-compliant passenger car to grade-crossing ; collision scenarios defined in both the proposed FRA Code of ; Federal Regulations (CFR) and European Standard (EN) ; 15227. The proposed FRA collision scenario involved a single ; car impacted by a cart. The cart had a punch mounted to it to ; hit a specific post of the end frame of the car. The EN 15227 ; collision scenario involved a complete train consist impacting a ; large deformable obstacle that approximates a lorry. The ; analyses show that these collision scenarios, while both gradecrossing ; scenarios, are very different not only in terms of the ; impact object and the amount of initial kinetic energy involved, ; but also in terms of how the car is loaded and deformed during ; impact. The FRA scenario is shown to be easier to analyze as ; well as easier to test than the EN 15227 scenario. Additionally, ; the FRA scenario is safer to test because of the levels of initial ; energy involved. The FRA scenario also provides clearer ; metrics of success. The FRA-compliant car utilized in the ; analyses and test conducted for this paper passed both FRA and ; EN 15227 grade-crossing collision scenarios according to the ; requirements for each respective standard. However, the ; analyses show that despite both scenarios providing for energy ; absorption in a grade-crossing collision, because the manner in ; which the car is loaded and deformed (concentrated vs. ; distributed) is different, the FRA performance standard and EN ; 15227 grade-crossing collision scenarios are not equivalent and ; mutual compliance is not guaranteed.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 2.67 MB]
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:a8d486bd2931e07f2114f2e347b8d4e0567ef8c9fe801709d2484f235952cb91a47741f1ae869262ccc73539a4f48b71c28707e809f28495876ff6ab668ccbee
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
 Found an issue?
Send us an email at:
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.