Oman, C., Huntley, M. S. J., & Rasmussen, S. (1996). Analog track angle error displays improve simulated GPS approach performance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8784
Oman, C.M., M. Stephen, Jr. Huntley, and S. Rasmussen. Analog track angle error displays improve simulated GPS approach performance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1996. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8784.
Oman, C.M., et al. Analog track angle error displays improve simulated GPS approach performance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1996, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8784.
Pilots flying non-precision instrument approaches traditionally rely on a course deviation indicator (CDI) analog display of cross track error (XTE) information. THe new generation of GPS based area navigation (RNAV) receivers can also compute accurate track angle error (TAE). Does display of supplementary TAE information improve intercept and tracking performance? Six pilots each flew 20 approaches in a light twin simulator to evaluate 3 different TAE/XTE display formats, in comparison to a conventional receiver CDI display and a more centrally located Horizontal Situation Indicator (HSI). Statistically significant performance improvements were seen in several phases of the approach when using the supplementary TAE information. Analog was preferred over numeric format. However, the advantage was offset by the need to widen the pilot's instrument scan to include the receiver display. Pilots found TAE helpful in establishing intercepts and the appropriate wind correction angle. Findings support the recent FAA TSO-C129 requirement that XTE be presented in the pilot's primary field of view and the recommendation that avionics manufacturers include supplementary analog TAE display capability.
Oman, C., Huntley, M. S. J., & Rasmussen, S. (1996). Analog track angle error displays improve simulated GPS approach performance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8784
Oman, C.M., M. Stephen, Jr. Huntley, and S. Rasmussen. Analog track angle error displays improve simulated GPS approach performance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1996. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8784.
Oman, C.M., et al. Analog track angle error displays improve simulated GPS approach performance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1996, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/8784.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.